Tag Archives: trademark

Sam’s Club exposed to disgorgement for potential warranty differences in grey goods it sold

Monahan Prods. LLC v. Sam’s East, Inc., 2020 WL 2561255, No. 18-11561-FDS (D. Mass. May 20, 2020) Plaintiff makes UPPAbaby strollers. Sam’s is a chain of membership-only retail warehouse stores and, despite not being an authorized retailer, it sold actual … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A few thoughts on the Booking.com argument

The Justices were engaged and asking the right questions, despite everyone’s use of “trademark” as a verb to mean “register.” With a putatively generic term the equation is perhaps understandable since if it is unregistrable it will also be unprotectable … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

9th Circuit panel divides on evidence of injury in false advertising case

VBS Distribution, Inc. v. Nutrivita Laboratories, Inc., — Fed.Appx. —-, 2020 WL 2086557, No. 18-56317 (9th Cir. Apr. 30, 2020) The parties compete in the market for nutritional supplements and television programs. VBS sued for Lanham Act and California state … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

TM may look like a certification mark, but that doesn’t harm a competing trade organization

North American Olive Oil Ass’n v. D’avolio Inc., 16-CV-6986 (SJF) (ARL), 2020 WL 2079421 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2020) NAOOA, a trade association for olive oil marketers/sellers/etc., sued a number of defendants for false advertising about olive oil sold by others. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

11th Circuit protects (at least some) truthful references to product creation

Webster v. Dean Guitars, — F.3d —-, 2020 WL 1887783, No. 19-10013 (11th Cir. Apr. 16, 2020) Buddy Webster (pka Buddy Blaze), a successful guitar maker and technician, in the mid-1980s modified a Dean guitar and commissioned someone to paint … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Humvees in Call of Duty are constitutionally protected realism, not confusing/diluting

AM General LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., No. 17 Civ. 8644 (GBD) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2020) The district court allows Humvees to appear in realistic videogames by performing a full confusion analysis, despite purporting to follow Rogers v. Grimaldi. The … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Rogers continues to collapse into transformativeness in the Ninth Circuit: dog toy edition

VIP Products LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., No. 18-16012 (9th Cir. Mar. 21, 2020) VIP Products sells the “Bad Spaniels Silly Squeaker” dog toy, which resembles a bottle of Jack Daniel’s Old No. 7 Black Label Tennessee Whiskey, but … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

TheRealReal is ok except where it is FakeFake

Chanel, Inc. v. The RealReal, Inc., 2020 WL 1503422, No. 18-CV-10626 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) Very interesting case: Chanel sued TRR for trademark infringement etc. for allegedly overclaiming its association with Chanel by prominently advertising how much Chanel there … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

grey goods: materiality is key

Dentsply Sirona, Inc. v. Dental Brands For Less LLC, No. 15 Civ. 8775 (LGS), 2020 WL 1643891 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 2020) Trademark confusion is sometimes a normative conclusion, not an empirical one, even though the language surrounding it is empirical. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Mislabeled image of competitor’s LED screen as LG’s gets LG in trouble

Sansi North America, LLC v. LG Electronics USA, Inc., 2019 WL 8168069, No. CV 18-3541 PSG (SKx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2019) LG used a picture of Sansi’s LED displays in an article for a trade publication and accidentally labeled … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment