Copying before-and-after surgical photos can be false advertising despite Dastar

Aesthetic Associates, Inc. v. Key West Institute for Plastic
Surgery, Inc., No. 18-10059-CIV-MARTINEZ-OTAZO-REYES, 2019 WL 1922854 (S.D.
Fla. Feb. 5, 2019)
Plaintiff, whose principal is Dr. Portuese, sued defendants
for copyright infringement, removal of CMI and false advertising in passing off
Dr. Portuese’s surgical results as their own. A patient consented to
before-and-after pictures of a rhinoplasty, to be posted on Portuese’s
websites; plaintiff registered the copyright.
Defendants allegedly posted the same before-and-after
patient photographs on their social media accounts in a manner that attempts to
pass off Portuese’s surgical results as those of defendants.
Defendants said Dastar
barred the claim; the court disagreed. 
Plaintiffs alleged the use of copyright photos with false
representations of fact “in a manner likely to cause confusion and deceive the
public into believing Dr. Loessin performed the surgery depicted in the
before-and-after patient photographs and that he can obtain those results.”  That was enough to state a claim for reverse
passing off.  It wasn’t just a restated
copyright claim.  [Less convincingly, the
court distinguishes Dastar because
the copyright here isn’t expired—irrelevant—and because defendants didn’t
“manufacture” the photo at issue, but of course they did “manufacture” their copy; the whole point is that they
made an unauthorized copy, but didn’t “make” the expressive content of their copy. 
The court should have rested on its better reasons.]

from Blogger

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s