Monthly Archives: January 2020

Reading list: disclosures as compelled commercial speech

Posted on January 10, 2020 by rtushnet

Reading list: Aaron Stenz, Note: The Controversial Demise of Zauderer: Revitalizing Zauderer Post-NIFLA, 104 Minn. L. Rev. 553 (2019). The First Amendment broadly stands for the idea that government attempts to curtail the right of the American people to both … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Malwarebytes: same result, new puzzles on remand for 230 immunity

Posted on January 6, 2020 by rtushnet

Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v. Malwarebytes, Inc., — F.3d —-, 2019 WL 7373959, No. 17-17351 (9th Cir. Dec. 31, 2019) New opinion, same result; no rehearing en banc. Because the parties are competitors, §230 does not provide Malwarebytes with … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

another timeshare exit company can be sued under state law, but not Lanham Act

Posted on January 6, 2020 by rtushnet

Orange Lake Country Club, Inc. v. Reed Hein & Assoc., LLC, 2019 WL 7423517, No: 6:17-cv-1542-Orl-78DCI (M.D. Fla. Oct. 4, 2019) Another timeshare case, this one kicking out Lanham Act claims but not FDUTPA deceptive practices claims on proximate cause. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

“most experienced” is puffery, but misrepresenting degree of responsibility for projects could be false

Posted on January 2, 2020 by rtushnet

Cypress Advisors, Inc. v. Davis, 2019 WL 7290948, No. 17-cv-01219-MSK-KLM (D. Colo. Aug. 28, 2019) Cypress provides financial advice to clients in the franchise restaurant industry. Defendant Kent Davis used to work there, but he left and started a competing … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“diet” isn’t misleading for soda even if surveys say it is

Posted on January 1, 2020 by rtushnet

Becerra v. Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc., 2019 WL 7287554, No. 18-16721 (9th Cir. Dec. 30, 2019) Becerra alleged that Dr Pepper violated the usual California consumer-fraud laws by branding Diet Dr Pepper using the word “diet.” She cited dictionary definitions … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Competitor’s Google review accusing P of “scam” was nondefamatory opinion

Posted on January 1, 2020 by rtushnet

Creditors Relief LLC v. United Debt Settlement LLC, 2019 WL 7288978, No. 17-7474 (D.N.J. Dec. 30, 2019) Plaintiff CR is a New Jersey-based debt settlement company that has allegedly “received significant publicity and an A+ rating from the Better Business … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment