Author Archives: rtushnet

230 bars false advertising claim against antimalware provider

Enigma Software Group USA LLC v. Malwarebytes Inc., No. 5:17-cv-02915, 2017 WL 5153698 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2017) Malwarebytes and Enigma compete in the anti-malware software market.  When Malwarebytes’s software detects an unwanted program, it displays a notification and asks … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Ad intermediary lacks standing under Lexmark to challenge false ads

Congoo, LLC v. Revcontent LLC, 2017 WL 5076397, No. 16-401 (D.N.J. Nov. 3, 2017) A rare case discussing Lexmark’s proximate cause requirement in some detail. Congoo operates an online ad business as Adblade, an aggregator that serves as an intermediary … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Competitor can’t challenge compliance w/certification standards

Board-Tech Electronic Co. v. Eaton Electric Holdings LCC, 2017 WL 4990659, No. 17-cv-5028 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2017) Board-Tech accused its competitor in the light switch market, Eaton, of false advertising because, while Eaton was authorized to apply the “UL” certification … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“look like new forever” might not be puffery in context of technological innovation claims

EP Henry Corp. v. Cambridge Pavers, Inc., 2017 WL 4948064, No. 17-1538  (D.N.J. Oct. 31, 2017) Disclosure: I consulted on this case.  EP Henry and Cambridge compete in the market for concrete pavingstones. Cambridge made superiority such as “only Cambridge … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Consumers can’t recover for GM’s self-tarnishment

In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation, — F.Supp.3d —- 2017 WL 2839154, No. 14–MD–2543 (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 30, 2017) This multidistrict litigation arose from the 2014 recall by General Motors LLC (New GM) of General Motors (GM) vehicles that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Just in time for Halloween, a Reese’s question

Should Reese’s object to the following description of candy molds? The “Reese’s Shape” version of the tartlet/candy mold Nominative fair use? from Blogger http://ift.tt/2gQoieM

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Initial decision in FTC 1-800 case finding that anti-keyword agreements violated antitrust law

Agreed-on limits on advertising, like agreed-on limits on other inputs, risk being a per se violation of the antitrust laws.  Here, a blanket ban, including a negative keyword requirement (so that someone bidding on “contacts” wouldn’t get ads run against … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Public disclosure of private facts

Setting FERPA aside, does Taiwan Jones have any claim based on the viral tweet about his failed midterm?  (Skepticism here.) from Blogger http://ift.tt/2yTyE5W

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Website copying allegations allow potpourri of claims

DHI Group, Inc. v. Kent, No. 16-1670, 2017 WL 4837730 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2017) DHI and Oilpro compete in the market for websites for oil and gas professionals that include job postings. DHI filed a lawsuit against Oilpro and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Likely success & irreparable harm still doesn’t justify ex parte TRO against false ad. given counterspeech

Verified Nutrition, LLC v. Sclar, 2017 WL 4785948, No. 17-cv-07499 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2017) Verified sells ProstaGenix, which is “an all-natural supplement with a proprietary form of Beta-sitosterol” (BetaRexin). Verified primarily advertises ProstaGenix through an infomercial featuring Larry King, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment