-
Recent Posts
- A thin record prevents ruling on a thin copyright
- Reading list: The Vanishing Enforcer: Consumer Protection in an Era of Dual Retrenchment
- prefacing statements with “allegedly” or calling them “estimates” doesn’t make them nonfalsifiable opinion
- two cases reach opposite results over whether “health” claims are misleading if products are lead-contaminated
- “carbon neutral” not plausibly misleading where D bought offsets from 3d-party certifiers, despite methodological disputes
Recent Comments
Archives
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Author Archives: rtushnet
lack of harm allegations beyond “direct competition plus customer inquiries” insufficient for false advertising standing
Kalmbach Feeds, Inc. v. Purina Animal Nutrition, LLC, 2026 WL 598608, No. 2:25-cv-00617 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2026) Previously. Kalmbach sued Defendant Purina for false advertising under state and federal law in connection with its Farm to Flock chicken feed, … Continue reading
Commemorating 50 Years of the Copyright Act, part 3
STLR Panel 2: Litigating Fair Use in Copyright Zahr Said: Substantial similarity is confused. Sedlik is a good example. Laudable for concurrences to recognize need for reform in this crummy, confusing test, but that’s not reflected in the case itself. … Continue reading
Commemorating 50 Years of the Copyright Act, part 2
The 1976 Copyright Act: Mostly Evolutionary, Not Revolutionary Tyler Ochoa 1790 Act adopted the Statute of Anne—not radical even though it was the first for the US. Similar here—major changes, but not radical. Expanded subject matter; protection on creation/fixation instead … Continue reading
Commemorating 50 Years of the 1976 Copyright Act, Stanford Law School
The Copyright Act at 50: Evolution and Impact Shira Perlmutter Copyright Act took a long time, with input from lots of interest groups and attention to detail—hundreds of contending and overlapping interests were involved. Hard to imagine this process today. … Continue reading
court gives guidance on disclaimer placement, AI alterations in enforcement proceeding
InSinkErator LLC v. Joneca Company LLC, 2025 WL 4631972, No. 8:24-cv-02600-JVS-ADS (C.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2025) Previous discussion of this false advertising case. In a separate order, the court deals with other compliance issues than those below. It rejects the … Continue reading
former TM owner states valid damages claim against licensee of current TM owner that drove it out of business via infringement
Wagner Zip-Change, Inc. v. Tubelitedenco, No. 23 C 05077, 2026 WL 673148 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 10, 2026) Wild facts! Wagner was until 2021 in the business of selling sign lettering products, including its trademarked Jewelite Trim (also known as “trim … Continue reading
delay still defeats Lanham Act presumption of irreparable harm
Skillz Platform Inc. v. Voodoo SAS, 2026 WL 717220, No. 24-CV-4991 (VSB) (JW) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 12, 2026) Skillz sought an injunction against defendants’ allegedly false representations about not using bots, and against defendants’ use of bots, in their gaming applications. … Continue reading
damages requirement trips up another false advertising case with sophisticated customers
Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Axion Biosystems, Inc., 2026 WL 734986, No. 23-198-CJB (D. Del. Mar. 12, 2026) Agilent alleged patent infringement and false advertising by Axion in the advertising of its impedance-based cell assay products. E.g., “The simple and sensitive … Continue reading
drug makers face rocky road in making claims against sellers of compounded weight loss drugs
Three different cases reading Lexmark differently but mostly kicking out claims: Eli Lilly & Co. v. Aios, Inc., 2026 WL 836624, No. 25-cv-03535-HSG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2026) Eli Lilly sells Mounjaro and Zepbound, GLP-1 inhibitors containing tirzepatide. These are the … Continue reading
CEO/sole owner is liable to bankruptcy estate for deliberate false advertising campaign that ended in bankruptcy
In re Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (VPX Liquidating Trust v. Owoc), 2026 WL 822473, No. 22-17842-PDR, Adv. Pro. No. 24-01009-PDR (Bkrcy. S.D. Fla. Mar. 24, 2026) This is an interesting case about false advertising and individual officer liability in bankruptcy. The … Continue reading