Author Archives: rtushnet

2(a) avoids First Amendment challenge, for now

In re Tam, — F.3d –,  No. 2014-1203 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2015)   The Federal Circuit affirmed the refusal to register THE SLANTS for entertainment (a band) because it was disparaging, with “additional views” from one judge suggesting that … Continue reading →

Posted in first amendment, trademark | Leave a comment

Regression damages model fails to convince court

Reed Const. Data Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2014 WL 4746130, No. 09–CV–8578 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 24, 2014)   Reed sued McGraw-Hill for violations of the Lanham Act, the Sherman Act, and various state law torts. The parties … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Third Circuit clarifies its ascertainability rule but doesn’t remove it

Byrd v. Aaron’s Inc., 2015 WL 1727613, No. 14–3050 (3d Cir. Apr. 16, 2015)   The Byrds filed a putative class action against Aaron’s for violating the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. The court of appeals reversed the district … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Territoriality is no bar to keeping up with the Kardashians in Kroma dispute

Kroma Makeup EU, Ltd. v. Boldface Licensing Branding, Inc., No. 6:14–cv–1551, 2015 WL 1708757 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 15, 2015)   A foreign licensee of a US trademark sued US citizens for alleged infringement abroad, and sued its licensor for refusing … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Lanham Act injunctive relief available without proof of injury

Cascade Yarns, Inc. v. Knitting Fever, Inc., 2015 WL 1735517, No. C10–861 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 15, 2015)   This is another round of an “extensive” lawsuit between the parties, who compete to sell yarn. Relevant here are Cascade’s claims against … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Regression damages model fails to convince court

Reed Const. Data Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2014 WL 4746130, No. 09–CV–8578 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 24, 2014)   Reed sued McGraw-Hill for violations of the Lanham Act, the Sherman Act, and various state law torts. The parties … Continue reading →

Posted in antitrust, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, unfairness | Leave a comment

Third Circuit clarifies its ascertainability rule but doesn’t remove it

Byrd v. Aaron’s Inc., 2015 WL 1727613, No. 14–3050 (3d Cir. Apr. 16, 2015)   The Byrds filed a putative class action against Aaron’s for violating the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. The court of appeals reversed the district … Continue reading →

Posted in consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Territoriality is no bar to keeping up with the Kardashians in Kroma dispute

Kroma Makeup EU, Ltd. v. Boldface Licensing Branding, Inc., No. 6:14–cv–1551, 2015 WL 1708757 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 15, 2015)   A foreign licensee of a US trademark sued US citizens for alleged infringement abroad, and sued its licensor for refusing … Continue reading →

Posted in contracts, trademark | Leave a comment

Lanham Act injunctive relief available without proof of injury

Cascade Yarns, Inc. v. Knitting Fever, Inc., 2015 WL 1735517, No. C10–861 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 15, 2015)   This is another round of an “extensive” lawsuit between the parties, who compete to sell yarn. Relevant here are Cascade’s claims against … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, remedies | Leave a comment

Campbell conference: beyond transformative use

Panel VII. Beyond Transformative Use—Other Fair and Permitted Uses (Moderator, Professor Gomulkiewicz) (partial: I had to leave early, sorry)   Gomulkiewicz: sometimes licenses get a bad rap but they can be a powerful engine for creativity. Jessica Litman, University of … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment