Author Archives: rtushnet

State Little FTC Acts still have teeth, as Georgia’s proves

Federal Trade Commission v. Peyroux, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2024 WL 1283344, No. 1:21-cv-3329-AT (N.D. Ga. Mar. 11, 2024) The FTC and the state of Georgia sued three corporate defendants and two individual defendants, Peyroux and Detelich. The underlying acts carried … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Grubhub’s listing of unaffiliated restaurants on its platform could infringe TM

Lynn Scott, LLC v. Grubhub Inc., 2024 WL 3673718, No. 20 C 6334 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 6, 2024) Restaurants brought a putative class action alleging that Grubhub used their names and logos confusingly, asserting claims under the Lanham Act. “Grubhub … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

IPSC Closing Plenary: Fair Use After Warhol

Christopher Buccafusco, Copyrighting Style There are plenty of precedents that say style isn’t ©able. Appropriating the “core” of a work is not infringing in the absence of substantial similarity.there are also cases suggesting ©ability of style: Steinberg, saying style is … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

IPSC Breakout 5 Comparative Approaches

Stefania Fusco (co-author Valerio Sterzi), Does the EU Need an EBay-Like Case? Evidence Against Granting Automatic Injunctions in Europe Patent paper; issues involving NPEs similar to trolling issues in US. If most infringement cases are between noncompetitors, automatic injunction is … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Breakout 4 IP and Property/Contract Theory

Shyam Balganesh, The Eunomics of Intellectual Property Lon Fuller’s institutional design theory: understand institutional design as a way of understanding institutions on the understanding that they’re not infinitely mutable. One shouldn’t begin with an unilateral approach on their ends. Ordinary … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Breakout 3: Trademark and Unfair Competition

Mary Catherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in False Advertising and Trademark Consumers can devote much more (or less) time to a decision than seems rational for the amount of risk/benefit in their lives. Court expects consumers to be reasonably prudent … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

IPSC session 2 copyright/trademark

Copyrightable Subject Matter Kevin Collins, Copyright in Suburbia (Collins is a registered architect as well as a law prof) The stakes: whether © is “working” in suburbia matters in ways that might not be self-evident. Snack box approach: scattered observations … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: IP in the Aftermath of the Supreme Court and some TM

Mark Bartholomew, Publicity Rights After Warhol Risk that courts will apply Warhol to ROP cases, but transformativeness is the only element in the ROP defense as defined by the California SCt rather than a multifactor fair use test. This could … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Opening Plenary Session

IP Outside the (Doctrinal) Box Andrew Gilden: Love & Hate in IP IP’s struggles with joy, pleasure, and fun—happens with sex, but also with enjoyment. Courts are pretty openly hostile to statements by Ds that they enjoyed engaging in the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

“fair and skill-based” may falsely imply absence of bots in online gaming

Skillz Platform Inc. v. Papaya Gaming, Ltd., 2024 WL 3526853, No. 24cvl646(DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 23, 2024) Skillz sued its competitor in mobile gaming, Papaya, for violating federal and NY law against false advertising by falsely advertising that its games pit … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment