Author Archives: rtushnet

3d Circuit affirmance shows that false advertising damages remain hard to prove

CareDX, Inc. v. Natera, Inc., 2025 WL 2480117, No. 23-2427, No. 23-2428 (3d Cir. Aug. 28, 2025) The court of appeals affirms the district court in this Lanham Act/coordinate Delaware state law case based on allegedly false claims Natera made … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

keyword ad claim fails out of the gate, but bad (c) claim not yet challenged

Regalo Int’l LLC v. Aborder Prods. Inc, 2025 WL 2483167, No. 3:24-CV-03270-E (N.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2025) Eric Goldman on the keyword ad aspects of this case about pet and baby gates. Regalo alleged that Aborder sold “knock-offs of Plaintiffs’ … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

9th Circuit finds laches in false advertising case

World Nutrition Inc. v. Advanced Supplementary Tech. Corp., 2025 WL 2427613, No. 24-4976 (9th Cir. Aug. 22, 2025) Over a partial dissent, the court of appeals reverses the district court’s refusal of a laches defense in this false advertising case, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

graphic designer’s photos and hashtag using former client’s name didn’t infringe TM

Hilber v. Malley’s Candies, Inc., 2025 WL 2402329, No. 1:22-CV-02305 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 19, 2025) Advertising is often created by independent contractors, which has copyright risks when things go sour. Here, the court denies summary judgment on the defendant’s implied … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

literal falsity wasn’t enough without evidence of lost sales or harm to goodwill

G. W. Aru, LLC v. W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn., No. JKB-22-2636, 2025 WL 2402194 (D. Md. Aug. 19, 2025) Previous decision resolving some pretrial issues; this opinion comes after a bench trial, which resulted in a ruling for defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

class certification partly granted in Tesla self-driving case

In Re Tesla Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Litig., No. 22-cv-05240-RFL, 2025 WL 2391446 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2025) While not adopting all plaintiffs’ arguments, the court certifies a limited class to challenge Tesla’s full self-driving claims. I’m going to omit … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Recommended reading: Jessica Litman, Authorship Nonsense

 Read it here. Abstract: Copyright law’s primary device for promoting progress is to bestow rights on the authors of works. Rights vest automatically and last for a very long time. Authors’ choices to retain, license, or transfer those rights fuel … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

court rejects Schedule A claims against sellers of compatible parts/accessories

Bestway Inflatables & Material Corp. v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, 2025 WL 2380699, No. 24 C 11697 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 15, 2025) When they tell you that Schedule A cases … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

drug company plausibly alleged confusion about partnership but not falsity of “same drug” claims about Canadian imports

AbbVie Inc. v. Payer Matrix, LLC, No. 23 CV 2836, 2025 WL 2374490 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 15, 2025) AbbVie sells the specialty drugs Humira, Skyrizi, and Rinvoq. Payer Matrix is “an alternative funding provider that works with self-funded health plans … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

court finds unique tracking of units of fluoride products immaterial even if vaguely safety-related

Method Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. H2-Pharma, LLC, 2025 WL 2298395, No. 2:20-cv-753-ECM (M.D. Ala. Aug. 8, 2025) Method asked the court to reconsider its ruling granting summary judgment on certain false advertising claims to H2, which sells a fluoride product as … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment