Category Archives: Uncategorized

T-Mobile is plausibly liable for acts of explicitly authorized dealers

City of New York v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., 2020 WL 1498522, No. 451540/2019 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Mar. 23, 2020) The City of New York and the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) sued T-Mobile, its subsidiary MetroPCS New … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A blueberry bagel that is mostly imitation blueberry is plausibly misleading

Izquierdo v. Panera Bread Co., No. 18-CV-12127 (VSB), 2020 WL 1503557 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) Panera sold a “blueberry bagel” that allegedly wasn’t.  [My father thinks that bagels with fruit etc. in them already aren’t bagels, but the allegation here … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

TheRealReal is ok except where it is FakeFake

Chanel, Inc. v. The RealReal, Inc., 2020 WL 1503422, No. 18-CV-10626 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) Very interesting case: Chanel sued TRR for trademark infringement etc. for allegedly overclaiming its association with Chanel by prominently advertising how much Chanel there … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

grey goods: materiality is key

Dentsply Sirona, Inc. v. Dental Brands For Less LLC, No. 15 Civ. 8775 (LGS), 2020 WL 1643891 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 2020) Trademark confusion is sometimes a normative conclusion, not an empirical one, even though the language surrounding it is empirical. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

2d Circuit: no irreparable injury where website tracks clicks to buy

Carson Optical, Inc. v. Alista Corp., No. 19-2509, — Fed.Appx. —-, 2020 WL 1683460 (Mem) (2d Cir. Apr. 7, 2020) Interesting—the Second Circuit approves the district court’s reasoning that online sales can be tracked perfectly, and thus financial harm from … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“Maximum Strength” is plausibly misleading when cheaper Regular Strength has more active ingredient by volume

Al Haj v. Pfizer Inc., 2019 WL 3202807, No. 17 C 6730 (N.D. Ill. Jul. 16, 2019) Al Haj alleged that Pfizer deceived consumers by charging more for “Maximum Strength” Robitussin cough syrup than for “Regular Strength” Robitussin even though … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

100% Pure Aloe can contain preservatives, stabilizers in the absence of evidence from consumers that they care

Beardsall v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., — F.3d —-, 2020 WL 1429214, No. 19-1850 (2d Cir. Mar. 24, 2020) The court explains: Plaintiffs brought state consumer deception claims [under 12 different states’ laws] against defendant Fruit of the Earth and its … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

antitrust claim based in part on false advertising in concentrated market survives

Chase Manufacturing, Inc. v. Johns Manville Corp., 2020 WL 1433504, No. 19-cv-00872-MEH (D. Colo. Mar. 23, 2020) (magistrate) Chase sued JM for violations of the Lanham Act and the Sherman Act for tying and monopolization. JM sells construction products, including … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

230 protects anti-malware vendor against noncompetitors

Asurvio LP v. Malwarebytes Inc., No. 5:18-cv-05409-EJD, 2020 WL 1478345 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2020) Despite unfavorable precedent, Malwarebytes secures dismissal of this Lanham Act false advertising (and common law disparagement/tortious interference/unfair competition/ violation of the Texas Theft Liability Act … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“no soy protein” claim for dog food plausibly indicates no soy

Rice-Sherman v. Big Heart Pet Brands, Inc., No. 19-cv-03613-WHO, 2020 WL 1245130 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2020) Plaintiffs alleged that Big Heart falsely markets its Grain Free Easy to Digest Salmon Sweet Potato & Pumpkin Recipe Dog Food as “Grain … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment