Category Archives: Uncategorized

Lexmark’s harm requirement shields XYZ’s comparative claims

Verisign, Inc., v. XYZ.com LLC, No. 15-2526 (4th Cir. Feb. 8, 2017) Verisign sells internet domain names and operates the popular .com and .net top-level domains. In 2014, XYZ launched “.xyz,” a new top-level domain. As part of its marketing … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Challenging materiality when literal falsity is conceded

Smart Vent, Inc. v. USA Floodair Vents, Ltd., 193 F.Supp.3d 395 (D.N.J. 2016) Smart Vent alleged patent infringement and false advertising related to competitor Floodair’s flood vents, which it allegedly falsely claimed to be certified by various bodies.  The regulations … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Alleging that unauthorized reseller sells old product defeats first sale defense

Unite Eurotherapy, Inc. v. Walgreen Co., Case No.: 16-cv-01706, 2017 WL 513008 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2017) Unite sells boutique hair care products through authorized resellers and its own website. Unite alleged distribution agreements with all of its resellers, allowing … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

calling a rival “imitation” is neither defamatory nor confusing

Baltimore Sports & Social Club, Inc. v. Sport & Social, LLC, 2017 WL 526499, No. 16–cv–02953 (D. Md. Jan. 6, 2017)   BSSC logo Sport & Social logos BSSC initiated suit, claiming that Sport & Social’s use of the marks … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP, part 5

Zvi S. Rosen, The Lost (and Found) Copyright Records Before July 1870, copyright registrations were at each federal district court.  Form of oath dictated by statute; also deposited title page.  Deposit records; assignment records; indexes; misc. other records.  Process: register … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP, part 4

Mark McKenna & Jessica Silbey, Investigating Design: An Empirical Study of Industrial Design and IP Protection Interviews & institutional analysis. Hypothesis generating—anti-copying/copying practices, etc. Buccafusco: consider who’s in the sample—don’t limit to self-identified designers. Following career trajectories of design school … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP, part 3

Carys J. Craig, Relying on (User) Rights-Talk: On Copyright Limits and Rhetorical Risks Many ways to limit ©; here focusing on defenses/exceptions, the ideal type of which is fair use. If our goal is to constrain ©, what should we … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP, part 2

H. Brian Holland, We Are All Cyborgs Now: A Cognitive Theory of the Third-Party Doctrine Once upon a time there were categorical protectsion for private papers against search & seizure. Courts then ruled that personal property was no longer categorically … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP part one

Works-in-Progress Intellectual Property Colloquium Boston University School of Law Opening Plenary [missed beginning due to travel] Timothy K. Armstrong, Symbols, Systems, and Software as Intellectual Property: Time for CONTU, Part II? Functionality is still a problem. Altai seemed to work … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

P&G fails to clean up “natural” suit over baby wipes

Brenner v. Procter & Gamble Co., No. 16-1093, 2016 WL 8192946 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2016) Brenner sued on behalf of a putative nationwide class and a California subclass of those who purchased Pampers “Natural Clean” Baby Wipes.  The individual … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment