Category Archives: Uncategorized

Incarnadine: Pom’s FTCA violation could’ve given it unclean hands against Coca-Cola

Posted on May 6, 2016 by rtushnet

POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca Cola Co., No. CV 08-06237, 2016 WL 2587994 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2016)   After a trip to the Supreme Court, Pom’s false advertising case against Coca-Cola ended with a verdict in favor of Coca-Cola; … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

In which I sue Amazon again

Posted on May 5, 2016 by rtushnet

In FTC v. Amazon, the initial opinion was heavily, albeit badly, redacted.  With the able assistance of Paul Alan Levy from Public Citizen, MediaPost and I have moved to unseal the opinion and the documents on which it’s based, on … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Off the record: Use of name in instruction card doesn’t suggest endorsement

Posted on May 5, 2016 by rtushnet

Martin v. Wendy’s International, Inc., 2016 WL 1730648, No. 15 C 6998 (N.D. Ill. May 2, 2016)   Johannes Martin alleged that Wendy’s and Guinness World Records violated §43(a) and his Illinois right of publicity by using his identity in … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

CFP: IP + Race, at Boston College

Posted on May 4, 2016 by rtushnet

  The IP + Race conference hosted by Boston College in April 2017, sponsored by  Anjali Vats, Deidre Keller, Amit Basole, and Jessica Silbey, is seeking participants.  They are expecting special musical guests for the conference as well – all IP and critical race … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Copyright Office 512 Roundtable: Open Mic

Posted on May 3, 2016 by rtushnet

Official description: Panelists from previous sessions and observers may sign up at the roundtable to comment on topics discussed during earlier panels or raise and discuss other pertinent issues.   David Green, NBC Universal: what should the Office do at … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Copyright Office 512 Roundtable: Future of 512

Posted on May 3, 2016 by rtushnet

(In homage to Jonathan Zittrain, I am giving this panel the nickname, The Future of the Internet and How To Stop It)   Official description: General trends, including notice volume and other relevant empirical data; scalability and future viability of … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Copyright Office 512 Roundtable: Voluntary Measures and Industry Agreements

Posted on May 3, 2016 by rtushnet

Official description: Voluntary alternatives to and modifications of statutory notice-and-takedown process; best practices; collaborative efforts of content owners, service providers and others to address online infringement, including availability of programs to smaller service providers and creators; cooperation in identifying infringers; … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Copyright Office 512 Roundtable: Technological Strategies and Solutions

Posted on May 3, 2016 by rtushnet

  Official description: Infringement monitoring tools and services; automated sending of notices, including notice parameters; automated processing of notices; role of human review; identification of works through fingerprinting, hash identifiers, and other technologies; filtering, including “staydown” capabilities; fair use considerations; … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Seen on the way to the Copyright Office hearings

Posted on May 3, 2016 by rtushnet

Check out the “O” in the Chinatown mural, to the right.  After the Hangover II case, does LV have a cause of action? from Blogger http://ift.tt/1SKzFPd

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Copyright Office 512 Roundtable: Scope and Impact of Safe Harbors

Posted on May 3, 2016 by rtushnet

Scope and Impact of Safe Harbors   Official description: Scope of entities and activities covered by safe harbors; incentives (and disincentives) for creators, copyright owners, online providers, investors, and users; impact on licensing activities; effectiveness of remedies, including ability to … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment