-
Recent Posts
- State barber board wins battle against “Barber Shop” bar
- compounding pharmacies lose a round with Lilly on personalized medicine and GLP-1 comparison claims
- Bayer can’t enjoin J&J’s cancer superiority claims by showing methodological disputes
- “higher standard of safety” is puffery even as to child car seats
- phthalates could be “ingredient” for purposes of falsifying “only natural ingredients”
Recent Comments
Archives
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Copyright Office notice of inquiry on 1201
Comments I’ve seen so far: Organization for Transformative Works comment (of which I am very proud!) Public Knowledge New America’s Open Technology Institute New Media Rights Joint Libertarian Comments (R Street, FreedomWorks, and Niskanen Institute) International Documentary Association Consumers Union … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, Copyright Office notice of inquiry on 1201 1201, dmca, fanworks, my writings
Leave a comment
Anonymous defamatory posts are “advertising or promotion” under Lanham Act
Romeo & Juliette Laser Hair Removal, Inc. v. Assara I LLC, 2016 WL 815205, No. 8-cv-0442 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 29, 2016) R&J sued Assara and a number of related people eight years ago. The parties compete to offer laser hair … Continue reading
Land o’ (non)confusion: no dilution or reverse confusion with dissimilar goods
Hugunin v. Land O’ Lakes, Inc., No. 15-2815 (7th Cir. Mar. 1, 2016) This opinion reflects what you might call Judge Posner’s trademark mix of good sense and arrogance/lack of reasons enabling one to formulate an actual rule for … Continue reading
Trademark defendant wins rare unclean hands defense to injunction
Cochran Firm, P.C. v. Cochran Firm Los Angeles LLP, — Fed.Appx. —, 2016 WL 770129, No. 15–55816 (9th Cir. Feb. 29, 2016) A rare unclean hands win for a trademark defendant! The Cochran Firm appealed the district court’s order … Continue reading
Fraud claim by NY AG against Donald Trump revived on appeal
People ex rel. Schneiderman v. Trump Entrepreneur Initiative LLC, — N.Y.S.3d —-, 2016 WL 783216, 2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 01430 (Sup. Ct. Mar. 1, 2016) Snarky political note: It doesn’t appear that Trump could object to this ruling on … Continue reading
Hidden connections between doctors and the drugs they promote
The violations of the FTC Endorsement Guidelines seem very clear in the stories recounted by this Boston Globe investigation. H/T ST. from Blogger http://ift.tt/1UyHnQD
Transformative work of the day, Chris Christie edition
How many references can you spot in this Washington Post column? Until I got to the last line of the column, I had a different title for this post, but Alexandra Petri got there before me. from Blogger http://ift.tt/1UyHnjA
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Chris Christie edition, Transformative work of the day
Leave a comment
On the importance of knowing your genre
I haven’t written about the Sherrilyn Kenyon v. Cassandra Clare lawsuit over Darkhunters v. Shadowhunters, though I did read the complaint. I didn’t find the copyright claims to make it past assertions of similarity in ideas, though trademark is often … Continue reading
Initial comments on 1201: fixing what’s broken
I’ve been reading through the initial comments on 1201 for the Copyright Office’s inquiry. One overarching thought: current “winners”—successful exemption proponents—unanimously say the current process is broken. Current losers—unsuccessful exemption opponents—occasionally express openness to minor tweaks, such as a meaningless … Continue reading →