Category Archives: Uncategorized

Trademark scholars roundtable: the consumer in different contexts

Session 3:  The Consumer in Different Trade Mark Contexts Do the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? Is assessment of the reaction of the average consumer in trade … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

DMCA exemption followup

The OTW/EFF response to the Copyright Office’s additional questions, filed yesterday, is now available.  Of note, the Copyright Office asked us about the extent to which K-12 students and teachers were covered by the existing noncommercial exemption. from Blogger http://ift.tt/1RPqZq8

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Fourth Circuit destroys literal falsity

In re GNC Corp., — F.3d –, 2015 WL 3798174 (4th Cir. June 19, 2015)   Well, this is a terrible opinion that makes no sense.  In the Fourth Circuit, if reasonable experts disagree, it’s now impossible for one to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Trademark scholars roundtable: establishing the features of the consumer

Session 2: Establishing the Features of the Consumer   The UK courts have in recent years been quite explicit that the consumer is a normative construct, a fiction, and a benchmark. What does this mean? Does the modifier “average” or … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Trademark scholars roundtable: roles for the consumer in TM

Seventh Trademark Scholars Roundtable: The Construction of the Consumer in Trade Mark Law   Session 1: Roles for the Consumer in Trade Mark Law What role does the “consumer” (whether “average” or “reasonable” or otherwise) play in trade mark law? … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Ninth Circuit rejects class certification because ads differed

Cabral v. Supple LLC, — Fed.Appx. —-, 2015 WL 3855142, No. 13–55943 (9th Cir. June 23, 2015)   The court of appeals vacated the certification of a class of purchasers of a dietary supplement. The certified class was “[a]ll persons … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

claim of “improved” version of competitor’s product not likely to confuse

Arborjet, Inc. v. Rainbow Treecare Scientific Advancements, Inc., 63 F.Supp.3d 149 (D. Mass. 2014)   Arborjet sued Rainbow over an alleged breach of a sales agency agreement and won a preliminary injunction.  Arborjet makes insect and pest control products for … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

False patent marking isn’t material to business customers

Pactiv, LLC v. Multisorb Technologies, Inc., 63 F.Supp.3d 832 (N.D. Ill. 2014)   Pactiv and Multisorb compete to sell oxygen absorbers—“packets of chemicals that react with moisture to absorb oxygen when placed inside food containers,” keeping food fresher longer. The … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

London TM finds, food edition

“It’s All About the Base” pizza ad Chocolate boxes  More chocolate boxes For the last one, compare this story from Australia about another chocolatier. from Blogger http://ift.tt/1dmKrwP

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

it’s illegal to say that use of non-manufacturer accessories voids a warranty

EMED Technologies Corp.  v. Repro–Med Systems, Inc., No. 13–cv–1957, 2015 WL 3794967 (E.D. Cal. June 16, 2015)   The parties compete to supply components of medical devices used to administer immunoglobulin (human plasma and antibodies) to patients suffering from a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment