Category Archives: Uncategorized

False establishment claims not actionable under consumer protection law

Aloudi v. Intramedic Research Group, LLC, 2015 WL 4148381, No. 15-cv-00882 (N.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2015)   Aloudi brought the usual California/warranty claims against IRG for its claims about its JavaSLIM product, a “green coffee bean extract weight loss formula.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Dastar-barred claims can’t be repled as false advertising claims

Friedman v. Zimmer, No. 15-502 (C.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2015)   Richard Friedman sued Hans Zimmer and others, alleging that the score to 12 Years a Slave infringed his copyright to a composition, To Our Fallen.  Friedman also alleged violation … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Is it awful of me to want a Downfall remix featuring historians reacting?

Historians react with anger to Goebbels copyright ruling. H/T Zach Schrag. from Blogger http://ift.tt/1SkV01k

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Quote of the day: on trademark harm

Ralph Sharp Brown knew his stuff with respect to trademark theories of harm that go beyond lost sales: “Judge Frank has already pointed out that the defendant ought to have an opportunity to prove that he will not harm the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Amicus seeking rehearing in In re GNC

Brian Wolfman and I just filed this amicus on behalf of law professors seeking rehearing in the In re GNC case, which badly misunderstood literal falsity. from Blogger http://ift.tt/1M6pdSX

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

And his fate is still unlearn’d: Subway overcharge claim fails

Hollander v. Metropolitan Transp. Authority, 2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 50991(U), 2015 WL 4077193, No. 160972/13 (Sup. Ct. June 25, 2015)   Hollander sued the MTA on behalf of purchasers of 7–Day and 30–Day MetroCards, alleging they were falsely advertised because … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A rant on the Copyright Office’s Orphan Works proposal

And it’s not even from me!  As a dedicated ranter, however, I must recognize greatness in ranting when it appears.  Kyle Courtney, my hat’s off to you. from Blogger http://ift.tt/1D3axfd

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Reading list: Christine Jolls on visual disclosures

Christine Jolls, Debiasing Through Law and the First Amendment, 67 Stan. L. Rev. 1411 (2015): Law often compels the disclosure of information in particular—and, increasingly today, in visual—forms. Some judges conclude that such modern disclosure requirements break with the First … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Exaggerated and outdated photos literally false, court rules

Spruce Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. Festa Radon Technologies, Co., 2015 WL 4038802, No. 15–11521 (D. Mass. July 2, 2015)   Spruce and Festa compete in the radon mitigation industry, selling products for testing and reducing indoor levels of the colorless … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Venable on notable NAD product name ruling

Amy Mudge and Randall Shaheen explain the NAD’s take on product names: if you put two terms together, as in “Nourishing Coconut Shampoo,” the ingredient has to provide the benefit.  If not, it has to be called “Nourishing Shampoo with … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment