-
Recent Posts
- license agreement termination might be invalid transfer in gross without a new partner for licensor
- Reading list and comments: Doctrine, Data, and the Death of DuPont
- reasonable consumers read promotion terms on a gambling app, court rules
- Third Circuit affirms disgorgement award in “Made in the USA” case
- despite rejecting Lanham Act PI, court enjoins D from making negative statements about P in public if prospective customers might see
Recent Comments
Archives
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: class actions
Hall v. Marriott Int’l, Inc., No. 19cv1715-JO-AHG, 2023 WL 4417265, — F.R.D. – (S.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2023) Previous opinion in this case about allegedly deceptive/inadequately disclosed mandatory “resort fees.” The court ends up certifying an issues California class, but … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged class actions, consumer protection, false advertising
Leave a comment
over aggressive partial dissent, 11th Cir. allows some class claims against Ford “track ready” claims to proceed
Tershakovec v. Ford Motor Company, Inc., — F.4th —-, 2023 WL 4377585, No. 22-10575 (11th Cir. Jul. 7, 2023) Discussion of district court opinion. Ford advertised its Shelby GT350 Mustang as “track ready.” “But some Shelby models weren’t equipped for … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged class actions, consumer protection, false advertising, first amendment, standing
Leave a comment
no predominance of common issues where many consumers would still have taken the drug at issue
Painters & Allied Trades District Council 82 Health Care Fund v. Takeda Pharm. Co., 2023 WL 4191651, — F. Supp. 3d –, No. 2:17-cv-07223-JWH-AS (C.D. Cal. May 24, 2023) I tell my students that probabilistic claims are easier for competitors … Continue reading
Peloton music library class action fails because consumers probably didn’t see the claim
Passman v. Peloton Interactive, Inc., 2023 WL 3195941, No. 19-cv-11711 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. May 2, 2023) Interesting discussion of the way in which the objective reasonable consumer standard allows consumers classes to bring certain probabilistic claims, where some consumers might have … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged class actions, consumer protection, false advertising
Leave a comment
consumer class settlement can’t include injunctive relief unless there’s Art. III standing to seek injunctive relief
Williams v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC, — F.4th —-, 2023 WL 2906311, No. 22-11232 (11th Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) The court of appeals reversed approval of a settlement that would have provided injunctive relief and up to $8 million in monetary … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged class actions, consumer protection, remedies, standing
Leave a comment
Vanilla class action certified based on sufficient survey evidence
Vizcarra v. Unilever U.S., Inc., 2023 WL 2364736, No. 4:20-cv-02777 YGR (N.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2023) Hey, it’s a certified class in a vanilla case: Vizcarra alleged that Breyers Natural Vanilla Ice Cream misleadingly communicated that it contained vanilla flavor … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged class actions, consumer protection, false advertising, surveys
Leave a comment
Cal. statutory false advertising isn’t fraud and individual reliance isn’t necessary
Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner, LLC, 2021 WL 1264423, E073950, — Cal.Rptr.3d —- (Ct. App. 2021) Plaintiffs sought to represent a putative class, bringing claims against a landlord for (1) false advertising; (2) breach of the implied … Continue reading
inability to rely on claims provides standing to seek injunctive relief in 9th Circuit
Milan v. Clif Bar & Co., 2020 WL 5760450, No. 18-cv-02354-JD (N.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 2020) Plaintiffs brought the usual California claims against the “health and wellness message[s]” on defendant Clif Bar & Company’s “Kid Zbars” and “ ‘Classic’ Clif … Continue reading
escalated materiality requirement precludes class certification
Oddo v. Arocaire Air Conditioning & Heating, 2020 WL 5267917, Nos. 15-cv-01985-CAS Ex, 18-cv-07030-CAS(Ex) (C.D. Cal. May 18, 2020) These are consolidated putative class actions alleging that defendants’ HVAC systems have faulty thermal expansion valves (TXVs). A TXV is “a … Continue reading
California SCt rejects record-keeping ascertainability requirement
Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc., — P.3d —-, 2019 WL 3403895, S246490 (Cal. Jul. 29, 2019) Noel brought a putative class action on behalf of retail purchasers of an inflatable outdoor pool sold in packaging that allegedly misled buyers about … Continue reading