Tag Archives: consumer protection

pharmacos face judicial resistance to claims against compounding pharmacies for weight loss drugs

Three cases showing aspects of the challenges, only one of which even partially survives: Novo Nordisk, Inc. v. Brooksville Pharm. Inc., 785 F.Supp.3d 1123 (M.D. Fla. 2025) Novo Nordisk sells FDA-approved drugs containing semaglutide, Wegovy, Ozempic, and Rybelsus. Brooksville is … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

mislabeling nut ingredients doesn’t justify class action because not everyone has nut allergies

Fukaya v. Daiso California LLC, No. 23-cv-00099-RFL, 2025 WL 2644747 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 15, 2025) Fukaya, who is allergic to tree nuts, alleged that Daiso failed to properly label its pre-packaged food products as containing tree nuts on its English-language … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

class certification partly granted in Tesla self-driving case

In Re Tesla Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Litig., No. 22-cv-05240-RFL, 2025 WL 2391446 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2025) While not adopting all plaintiffs’ arguments, the court certifies a limited class to challenge Tesla’s full self-driving claims. I’m going to omit … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

7-11% oversupply of caffeine in energy drink wasn’t plausibly material

In Re: Prime Energy Consumer Litigation, No. 24 Civ. 2657 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 31, 2025) You can tell how this will go from the first sentence: “For those consumers seeking a jolt of energy in caffeinated-beverage form, does the inclusion … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Visual comparison in online contract formation

Cody v. Jill Acquisition LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 1822907, No. 25-CV-937 TWR (KSC) (S.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2025) I wouldn’t usually blog a consumer class action that was just about arbitration, but I want to highlight this one … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

9th Circuit affirms class status based on materiality of claim in product name

Noohi v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., — F.4th —-, 2025 WL 2089582, No. 23-55190 (9th Cir. Jul. 25, 2025) J&J sells Neutrogena Oil-Free Face Moisturizer for Sensitive Skin. The district court certified a class in a consumer protection case … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

amicus in Prevagen v. FTC appeal

 Led by Truth in Advertising; I was happy to sign on. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2025/07/amicus-in-prevagen-v-ftc-appeal.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

AI voice cloning opinion narrows claims to ROP, rejecting TM and (most) copyright theories

Lehrman v. Lovo, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 1902547, 24-CV-3770 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 10, 2025) Plaintiffs alleged that Lovo misled them about its use of their voices, using AI to synthesize and sell unauthorized “clones” of their voices. They … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

even if it’s not a security, a stablecoin can trigger false advertising claims

Donovan v. GMO-Z.com Trust Company, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 522503, No. 23 Civ. 8431 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, 2025) Plaintiffs sued GMO Trust, alleging that it violated federal securities laws and NY state consumer protection laws in connection … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

California’s Made in the USA safe harbors aren’t preempted by federal law

McCoy v. McCormick & Co., 2025 WL 1918546, No. 1:25-cv-00231-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2025) (R&R) McCoy alleged that French’s mustard bottles were falsely advertised with the claim “Crafted and Bottled in Springfield, MO, USA,” appearing at times with “American … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment