-
Recent Posts
- drug makers face rocky road in making claims against sellers of compounded weight loss drugs
- CEO/sole owner is liable to bankruptcy estate for deliberate false advertising campaign that ended in bankruptcy
- court dismisses vague false advertising counterclaims but allows challenge to Wonderful’s pistachio trade dress
- Meta’s AI assistance to advertisers defeats Section 230, court says
- CA6 interprets literal falsity narrowly but says materiality implements the standing requirement, yay
Recent Comments
Archives
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: copyright
Private Law and IP: Licensing I
Session 3: Licensing I Moderator: Yonathan Arbel Jonathan M. Barnett, “Why is Everyone Afraid of IP Licensing?”: Conventional view—be wary of encroachment on public domain from licensing transactions. Medley of limitations lay minefield for construction of transactions w/minimum legal risk. … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged contracts, copyright, patent, Private Law and IP: Licensing I conferences, trademark
Leave a comment
Private Law & IP: Institutions
Session 2: Institutions I Moderator: Patrick R. Goold Wendy J. Gordon, “Proximate Cause in Torts becomes Proximate Use in Copyright”: Common law has useful intuitions—tort for copyright—though I don’t pretend to know whether tort is optimal. Both tort and © … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, Private Law & IP: Institutions conferences
Leave a comment
Private Law and Intellectual Property conference at Harvard
Opening Remarks: Henry Smith—exploring the connections between private law and IP. Session 1: Entitlement Design Moderator: Rebecca L. Tushnet Speakers and Papers/Commentators: Tun-Jen Chiang, “The Paradox of IP”: A paper looking for a theory. Why do we have an … Continue reading
Copyright Office notice of inquiry on 1201
Comments I’ve seen so far: Organization for Transformative Works comment (of which I am very proud!) Public Knowledge New America’s Open Technology Institute New Media Rights Joint Libertarian Comments (R Street, FreedomWorks, and Niskanen Institute) International Documentary Association Consumers Union … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, Copyright Office notice of inquiry on 1201 1201, dmca, fanworks, my writings
Leave a comment
WIPIP Session 7: International issues
Session 7 Room 145: International IP Sean Flynn, Mike Palmedo, & Walter Park, Creating a Database of Changes to Copyright User Rights in 40 Nations Fair dealing is flexible (uses a balancing test) but not open (limited classes … Continue reading
WIPIP session 6: IP Theory
Session 6 IP Theory 3 BJ Ard, More Property-Like than Property: The Asymmetry of Remedies in Tangible and Intellectual Property Real property remedies are less “property-like” than IP remedies. Property v. liability rules. Real property often much more … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, patent, WIPIP session 6: IP Theory conferences
Leave a comment
WIPIP Session 5: Copyright 2
Session 5 Copyright 2 Zahr Said, A Transactional Approach to the Lay Observer in Copyright Law Internal contradictions in uses of the observer. Humanities perspective: copyright doesn’t have a theory of reading/interpretation/engaging with works. Reader response theory as … Continue reading
WIPIP Session 4: Design
Session 4: IP, Design, User Experience Sarah Burstein, Reviving Ornamentality: Fed. Cir. killed ornamentality in design; right now it means nothing other than Morton-Norwich nonfunctionality. She thinks we should bring it back. Two aspects: (1) “matter of concern” in … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, design patent, trademark, WIPIP Session 4: Design conferences
Leave a comment
WIPIP, plenary session 1
WIPIP, University of Washington School of Law Plenary Session 1: Innovation Policy Stephanie Bair, Promoting the Useful Arts: Corporate Edition 87% of patents are assigned to organizations, not individuals. How to motivate individuals/employees? Assumption is usually that companies … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, patent, plenary session 1 conferences, WIPIP
Leave a comment
Initial comments on 1201: fixing what’s broken
I’ve been reading through the initial comments on 1201 for the Copyright Office’s inquiry. One overarching thought: current “winners”—successful exemption proponents—unanimously say the current process is broken. Current losers—unsuccessful exemption opponents—occasionally express openness to minor tweaks, such as a meaningless … Continue reading →