Tag Archives: WIPIP

WIPIP, SESSION 2.B. — Copyrights

Posted on February 12, 2021 by rtushnet

Cathay Smith, University of Montana Blewett School of Law Weaponizing Copyright Pure suppression: Dr. Drew’s minimization of Covid; YouTubers compiled these clips and he sent takedown notices. Lawyer asserted © over text messages to ex partner when they were published … Continue reading →

Advertisement

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP, PLENARY SESSION 1 — Race, Gender, and IP

Posted on February 12, 2021 by rtushnet

Dan Burk, University of California, Irvine School of Law Racial Bias in Algorithmic IP Unpacking bias: divergent meanings: statistical bias (sampling), design (wrong type of model, model created for one purpose used for another), the fact that “raw data” is … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP, part 5

Posted on February 11, 2017 by rtushnet

Zvi S. Rosen, The Lost (and Found) Copyright Records Before July 1870, copyright registrations were at each federal district court.  Form of oath dictated by statute; also deposited title page.  Deposit records; assignment records; indexes; misc. other records.  Process: register … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP, part 4

Posted on February 11, 2017 by rtushnet

Mark McKenna & Jessica Silbey, Investigating Design: An Empirical Study of Industrial Design and IP Protection Interviews & institutional analysis. Hypothesis generating—anti-copying/copying practices, etc. Buccafusco: consider who’s in the sample—don’t limit to self-identified designers. Following career trajectories of design school … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP, part 3

Posted on February 10, 2017 by rtushnet

Carys J. Craig, Relying on (User) Rights-Talk: On Copyright Limits and Rhetorical Risks Many ways to limit ©; here focusing on defenses/exceptions, the ideal type of which is fair use. If our goal is to constrain ©, what should we … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP, part 2

Posted on February 10, 2017 by rtushnet

H. Brian Holland, We Are All Cyborgs Now: A Cognitive Theory of the Third-Party Doctrine Once upon a time there were categorical protectsion for private papers against search & seizure. Courts then ruled that personal property was no longer categorically … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP, plenary session 1

Posted on February 19, 2016 by rtushnet

WIPIP, University of Washington School of Law Plenary Session 1: Innovation Policy   Stephanie Bair, Promoting the Useful Arts: Corporate Edition   87% of patents are assigned to organizations, not individuals.  How to motivate individuals/employees?  Assumption is usually that companies … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment