Tag Archives: part 3 conferences

Legal Applications of Marketing Theory, part 3

Lorin Hitt, Vildan Altuglu, Samid Hussain, & Matteo Li Bergolis, Wharton & Cornerstone Research, Cornerstone Research, Cornerstone Research, Valuation of Privacy: Assessing Potential Harm from Unauthorized Access and Misuse of Private Information in Consumer Class Actions: Disputes over use of … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

TMSR, part 3

Session 3: Defining Marks in Trademark Law vs. Defining Subject Matter in Adjacent Areas of IP In formulating rules about defining marks in trademark law, what (if anything) can be learned from the longstanding debate about defining pictorial, graphic, and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

TM Scholars’ roundtable, part 3

Session 2:  The Policy and Doctrine of Unfair Competition Claims Introduction:  Jake Linford: Hoping for a sharper line b/t UC and TM, much as we have a relatively sharp statutory line b/t TM infringement and dilution to the extent we … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Notre Dame Scope Roundtable, part 3

Pam Samuelson, Functional Compilations Commentators: Zahr Said and Steve Yelderman Said: Framing questions: what is functionality? Does it differ in compilations v. other things?  Is it the same as the useful articles doctrine?  How do owners/litigants determine and assess functionality? … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP, part 3

Carys J. Craig, Relying on (User) Rights-Talk: On Copyright Limits and Rhetorical Risks Many ways to limit ©; here focusing on defenses/exceptions, the ideal type of which is fair use. If our goal is to constrain ©, what should we … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

TM roundtable, part 3

Session 2:  The Menu of Options for Design Protection:  Where Does/Should Trademark and Unfair Competition Law Fit? This session will consider product-design trade dress protection in relation to other legal regimes that encompass design (design patents, copyright, and sui generis … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Notre Dame Deception Roundtable, part 3

Session 3 – Defamation and Speech Discussion Leaders: Amy Gajda, Rebecca Tushnet, Eric Goldman, Jessica Silbey   Silbey: Alvarez and a theory of deception as speech. The three opinions are helpfully, though perhaps erroneously, talking about bad speech in three … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment