Tag Archives: design patent

Design Law at GW Law: Design Patent Damages

Posted on October 14, 2016 by rtushnet

Design Law 2016, GW Law MORNING SESSION 1: Design Patent Damages Moderator: Robert Katz, Banner & Witcoff: Recap of the patents in suit and damage award. Text of 289: whoever applies the patented design or colorable imitation thereof to any … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Stanford Sociology & Psychology of IP, branding

Posted on September 10, 2016 by rtushnet

Session 4: The sociology and psychology of brands Discussion leaders: Jeanne Fromer: A lot of work in this area. Some is about how consumers react to branding in systematic ways.  Rule of thumb in talking to branding folks: if you … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Sociology and Psychology of IP, Session 3: What can we learn from IP-free zones?

Posted on September 10, 2016 by rtushnet

Discussion leaders: Kate Darling: attribution as something that people want rather than money in “negative spaces.” They know they can monetize their reputations.  Systems of self-governance often differ from those of formal law.  Attribution preference is not just about fairness/ego. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sociology and Psychology of IP, Session 3: What can we learn from IP-free zones?

Posted on September 10, 2016 by rtushnet

Discussion leaders: Kate Darling: attribution as something that people want rather than money in “negative spaces.” They know they can monetize their reputations.  Systems of self-governance often differ from those of formal law.  Attribution preference is not just about fairness/ego. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Psychology and Sociology of IP, patents

Posted on September 9, 2016 by rtushnet

Session 2: Why do companies patent? Discussion leaders: Lisa Ouellette: Accounts indicate that non-incentive reasons drive much patenting, contrary to standard incentive story.  What do sociologists etc. think about this divide in accounts?  Sociology/psychology give us tools when economic rationality … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC First Plenary Session

Posted on August 11, 2016 by rtushnet

Scarcity of Attention in a World without IP Jake Linford We impose artificial scarcity so authors can pick up sunk costs. But costs of creation have fallen; perhaps © should be narrowed as a result.  Wrinkle: attention scarcity. Cheaper dissemination … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Design Patent Damages event in DC, Aug. 2

Posted on July 29, 2016 by rtushnet

Details/RSVP here. from Blogger http://ift.tt/2atR8k7

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Design Patent Damages event in DC, Aug. 2

Posted on July 29, 2016 by rtushnet

Details/RSVP here. from Blogger http://ift.tt/2atR8k7

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IP Professors’ Amicus in Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands

Posted on July 22, 2016 by rtushnet

Filed today: Mark McKenna, Chris Sprigman, Mark Lemley, Tyler Ochoa, Betsy Rosenblatt, Pam Samuelson, Kathy Strandburg, and I submitted a brief in this copyright separability case, arguing that conceptual separability is simply a coda to physical separability, dealing with situations … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

TM roundtable, part 4

Posted on June 9, 2016 by rtushnet

From last time: RT: I was thinking as Silbey was talking that you’re convincing me that TM should be a particular kind of anticopying regime (though, as w/patent, knowledge need not be required, at least for double identity).  And that … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment