Tag Archives: disclosures

Court finds literal falsity where two supposedly distinct, rated reverse mortgage sellers are actually one

Longbridge Financial, LLC v. Mutual of Omaha Mortgage, Inc., No. 24-cv-1730-DMS-VET, 2025 WL 1382866 (S.D. Cal. May 13, 2025) Mutual owns defendant Review Counsel and is the first and only advertising partner of defendant Advisory; those two have similar websites. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

package claim that required users to double serving size and add ingredient was plausibly misleading despite disclaimer

Mencia-Montes v. Fit Foods Distrib., Inc., 2025 WL 1185372, No. 24-cv-01768-EKL (N.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2025) Courts in the 9th Circuit have increasingly held, in consumer protection cases, that an asterisk puts the consumer on notice of important qualifications. But … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

asterisk alone makes front of package claims ambiguous

Wong v. Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A. Inc., 2025 WL 821451, No. 2:24-cv-00901-DAD-CKD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2025) Is an asterisk on the front of a package a get-out-of-jail-free card for false advertising? If the disclosure doesn’t flatly contradict the claim, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

false claims of buying and “rebranding” a festival lead to disclosure/correction remedies

Nantucket Wine & Food Festival, LLC v. Gordon Companies, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, No. 24-11640-LTS, 2024 WL 5442374 (D. Mass. Dec. 12, 2024) Wild facts here. Plaintiff NWF runs an annual, multi-day event on Nantucket called the Nantucket Wine & … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

GIGO? literal falsity and a remedy mismatch

InSinkErator LLC v. Joneca Co., No. 8:24-cv-02600-JVS-ADS, 2025 WL 250032 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2025) InSinkErator, allegedly the world’s largest manufacturer of garbage disposals for home and commercial use (and to its shame, an entity that sued a TV show … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

incontestable LIZZIE BORDEN registration + actual confusion insufficient to overcome weight of history, 1st Circuit rules

US Ghost Adventures, LLC v. Miss Lizzie’s Coffee LLC, No. 23-2000 (1st Cir. Nov. 15, 2024) The Lizzie Borden House “bears a storied history that originates with the still-unsolved murders — in 1892 — of Lizzie Borden’s father and stepmother.” … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

6th Circuit applies JDI to political speech, but holds that disclaimers avoid confusion

Libertarian National Committee, Inc. v. Saliba, No. 23-1856 (6th Cir. Aug. 28, 2024) Dissenting members of the Libertarian Party of Michigan maintain that they are the true Michigan affiliate. The Libertarian National Committee sued and the district court enjoined them … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

5th Circuit allows image-based tobacco warnings in barest nod to consistency on compelled commercial speech

R J Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Food & Drug Admin., 2024 WL 1208111, — F.4th —-, No. 23-40076 (5th Cir. Mar. 21, 2024) The sudden shift in the political valence of the commercial speech doctrine strikes again! The Fifth Circuit … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Amicus brief on applying the Lanham Act to political speech post-JDI

 In support of neither party. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2023/12/amicus-brief-on-applying-lanham-act-to.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

it is unfair to fail to disclose paid promotion/for influencers not to do due diligence on what they promote

In Re Ethereummax Investor Litig., No. CV 22-00163-MWF (SKx), 2023 WL 6787827 (C.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2023) EMAX is a cryptocurrency project centered around the EthereumMax, which can be traded, spent, or otherwise transacted between token holders. EMAX Tokens were … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment