-
Recent Posts
- Second Annual Aspiring Free Speech Scholars Workshop
- court allows TM and false advertising claims against “toxic backlink” SEO disparagement campaign (SEM, for minimization?)
- Instagram disparagement by alleged competitor isn’t commercial speech
- Reading list: Deception wins at the Federal Circuit
- 9th Circuit applies Dastar to bar false advertising liability based on “first to market” claims
Recent Comments
Archives
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: false advertising
“tasting like a smooth whisky” is not a disclosure that there’s no whisky in the bottle
Pizzaro v. Sazerac Co., 2025 WL 2682673, No. 23-CV-2751 (KMK), No. 23-CV-4323 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 18, 2025) The court certifies a class of purchasers alleging deception in their purchases of Fireball and Parrot Bay malt beverage (16.5% ABV) that looked … Continue reading
mislabeling nut ingredients doesn’t justify class action because not everyone has nut allergies
Fukaya v. Daiso California LLC, No. 23-cv-00099-RFL, 2025 WL 2644747 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 15, 2025) Fukaya, who is allergic to tree nuts, alleged that Daiso failed to properly label its pre-packaged food products as containing tree nuts on its English-language … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged consumer protection, false advertising, fda, preemption
Leave a comment
sending DMCA notices about uncopyrightable work might be willful blindness, or not
Leszczynski v. Kitchen Cube LLC, 2025 WL 2551098, No. 8:23-cv-01698-MEMF-ADS (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2025) Previous discussion. I find this case interesting because of the underlying gadget, the Kitchen Cube, which has depressions on different sides corresponding to different standard … Continue reading
2021 statements, even if false, not plausibly connected to 2024 sales loss
Trilogy Federal, LLC v. CivitasDX LLC, No. 24-2713, No. 25-792, 2025 WL 2651240 (D.D.C. Sept. 16, 2025) Just looking at the false advertising-related aspects of a complicated dispute. The parties sought to sell things to the government, specifically the VA. … Continue reading
general competitor has Lanham Act standing even if it doesn’t compete in alleged false advertiser’s subcategory
Colorado Biolabs, Inc. v. Three Arrows Nutra, LLC, No. 3:25-CV-0601-D, 2025 WL 2524313 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 2, 2025) CBL sued Three Arrows for breach of a settlement agreement and related claims; Three Arrows counterclaimed along similar lines. The parties sell … Continue reading
3d Circuit affirmance shows that false advertising damages remain hard to prove
CareDX, Inc. v. Natera, Inc., 2025 WL 2480117, No. 23-2427, No. 23-2428 (3d Cir. Aug. 28, 2025) The court of appeals affirms the district court in this Lanham Act/coordinate Delaware state law case based on allegedly false claims Natera made … Continue reading
keyword ad claim fails out of the gate, but bad (c) claim not yet challenged
Regalo Int’l LLC v. Aborder Prods. Inc, 2025 WL 2483167, No. 3:24-CV-03270-E (N.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2025) Eric Goldman on the keyword ad aspects of this case about pet and baby gates. Regalo alleged that Aborder sold “knock-offs of Plaintiffs’ … Continue reading
9th Circuit finds laches in false advertising case
World Nutrition Inc. v. Advanced Supplementary Tech. Corp., 2025 WL 2427613, No. 24-4976 (9th Cir. Aug. 22, 2025) Over a partial dissent, the court of appeals reverses the district court’s refusal of a laches defense in this false advertising case, … Continue reading
literal falsity wasn’t enough without evidence of lost sales or harm to goodwill
G. W. Aru, LLC v. W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn., No. JKB-22-2636, 2025 WL 2402194 (D. Md. Aug. 19, 2025) Previous decision resolving some pretrial issues; this opinion comes after a bench trial, which resulted in a ruling for defendant … Continue reading
class certification partly granted in Tesla self-driving case
In Re Tesla Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Litig., No. 22-cv-05240-RFL, 2025 WL 2391446 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2025) While not adopting all plaintiffs’ arguments, the court certifies a limited class to challenge Tesla’s full self-driving claims. I’m going to omit … Continue reading