Tag Archives: false advertising

laches, once established, bars Lanham Act claims even during more recent periods

Design Gaps, Inc. v. Distinctive Design & Construction LLC, — F.4th —-, 2025 WL 3492373, No. 24-1860 (Dec. 5, 2025) Super complicated facts; I’ll try to focus on the Lanham Act laches part because of that. “[A]fter a squabble developed … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

what particularity is required when an ad campaign has zillions of possibly algorithmic variants?

Ledesma v. Hismile, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 3785960, No. 24-cv-03626-KAW (N.D. Cal. Sept. 23, 2025) Blogging because it’s one of the first cases I’ve seen that has to address questions raised by algorithmically modified ads that are different … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

literal falsity can exist without bald-faced lies, 9th Circuit confirms

InSinkErator, LLC v. Joneca Co., No. 25-286 (9th Cir. Dec. 29, 2025) The court of appeals affirms the grant of a preliminary injunction, previously discussed, against Joneca’s advertising of its garbage disposals. InSinkErator argued that Joneca’s horsepower designations were literally … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

no abuse of discretion in PI requiring advertiser to terminate liens that it told homeowners weren’t liens

People v. MV Realty PBC, LLC, 2025 WL 3719896, B341121 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2025) Blogging more in my property law prof hat, but with false advertising. MV Realty recorded liens on its customers’ properties, but assured homeowners that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“monk fruit sweetener” plausibly should have more than 1.15% monkfruit

Grimbaldeston v. Saraya USA, Inc., 2025 WL 3677857, No. 25-cv-05649-RFL (N.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2025) Grimbaldeston brought the usual California claims based on allegations that Saraya deceptively overstated the amount of monk fruit in its sugar substitute. The court mostly … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

license agreement termination might be invalid transfer in gross without a new partner for licensor

Form Portfolios LLC v. Food52, Inc., 2025 WL 3638165, No. 24-cv-07690 (NCM) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2025) Form designs consumer products, partnering with other companies that license those designs. Food52 sells cookware and other homegoods under the brand Dansk. This … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

reasonable consumers read promotion terms on a gambling app, court rules

De Leon v. DraftKings, Inc., 2025 WL 3551627, No. 25cv644 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 11, 2025) The court rejects false advertising claims against gambling site DraftKings. “Three of the plaintiffs became addicted to online gambling and have suffered both financial and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Third Circuit affirms disgorgement award in “Made in the USA” case

Newborn Bros. Co. v. Albion Engineering Co., No. 24-1548, No. 24-3046, 2025 WL 3540060 (3d Cir. Dec. 10, 2025) Along with his rally-going, Judge Bove did participate in this nonprecedential affirmance of various rulings, including disgorgement, in this false advertising … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

despite rejecting Lanham Act PI, court enjoins D from making negative statements about P in public if prospective customers might see

Red Sense LLC v. Bohuslavskiy, 2025 WL 3539968, No. 25cv12281 (EP) (AME) (D.N.J. Dec. 10, 2025) This case illustrates that tortious interference has a small remaining scope—where there’s no “commercial advertising or promotion” because of the failure to solicit a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

9th Circuit chips away at consumer protection again

Hussain v. Campbell Soup Co., No. 24-6041 (9th Cir. Dec. 10, 2025) Nonprecedential despite a dissent. The majority affirms dismissal of claims in a putative class action suit alleging that Kettle Brand “Air Fried” chips are deceptively labeled as solely … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment