Tag Archives: false advertising

allegedly false claims for compounded weight loss drugs didn’t plausibly threaten Eli Lilly’s reputation

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Mochi Health Corp., 2025 WL 2998166, No. 25-cv-03534-JSC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2025) Another of the cases in which Eli Lilly’s attempts to protect its GLP-antagonist market do surprisingly badly, once again highlighting the higher … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Coinbase can’t force claim for injunctive relief into arbitration

Khan v. Coinbase, Inc., 2025 WL 2985378, No. A172063, — Cal.Rptr.3d —-, (Ct. App. Oct. 23, 2025) The appellate court affirmed the denial of Coinbase’s attempt to send Khan’s false advertising claims to arbitration, holding that Khan sought public injunctive … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“GMO-free” avocado oil isn’t deceptive even if all avocado oil is GMO-free

Whiteside v. Chosen Foods, LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 2460192, No. 3:25-cv-00481-CAB-DDL (S.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2025) xkcd, “Free” XKCD may hate it, but the law will allow it. Plaintiff alleged that defendants misleadingly advertised their avocado oil by … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Another “natural” claim proceeds for pet food labeled “natural + vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients”

Cobovic v. Mars Petcare US, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, No. 24-CV-7730 (ARR) (JAM) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 20, 2025) Cobovic alleged that the use of the word “natural” on the front label pet food was false and misleading under NY law because … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

claims about scientific studies might imply FDA approval

BioGaia USA, LLC v. Probiotiv Naturals LLC, 2025 WL 2946910, No. CV 25-3592 PA (MBKx) (C.D. Cal. Sept. 5, 2025) BioGaia sued Probiotiv – a competitor in the sale of priobiotic dietary supplements for oral health, for false advertising; Probiotiv … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

New Jersey would not recognize a common law tort of false advertising, says fed ct

Pim Brands, Inc. v. New Cibo Vita LLC, No. 25-cv-01418(MEF)(AME), 2025 WL 2938602 (D.N.J. Oct. 16, 2025) The parties compete in the market for yogurt-covered fruit snacks, and the plaintiff alleged false advertising, including unfair competition claim under New Jersey … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

California’s limits on use of “doctor” in healthcare settings are constitutional regulations of commercial speech

Palmer v. Bonta, 2025 WL 2882948, No. EDCV 23-1047 JGB (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Sept. 19, 2025) Plaintiffs alleged that California Business and Professions Code § 2054(a), on its face and as enforced, violates the First Amendment because it provides, in … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

court allows false advertising claim based on manipulation of Amazon’s “variation” system

Corsair Gaming, Inc. v. Choice Electronics Inc., 2025 WL 2822691, No. 5:25-cv-00045-BLF (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2025) Corsair sued Choice for alleged infringement by selling used, unauthorized, or counterfeit Corsair computer/gaming products. This opinion deals with Choice’s counterclaims. The false … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

court rejects affiliation confusion theory for lack of harm, declines to order tarps over P’s goods

Survitec Survival Prods., Inc. v. Fire Protection Service, Inc., 2025 WL 2782332, No. H-21-312 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2025) This case demonstrates exactly why harm to the plaintiff should be explicitly a part of a trademark case that relies on … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Second Circuit reverses literal falsity finding based on dispute over meaning of “brand”

Zesty Paws LLC v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., — F.4th —-, No. 24-1810, 2025 WL 2810078 (2d Cir. Oct. 3, 2025) The court of appeals reverses the district court opinion discussed here, which had granted a preliminary injunction on Zesty’s Lanham … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment