-
Recent Posts
- license agreement termination might be invalid transfer in gross without a new partner for licensor
- Reading list and comments: Doctrine, Data, and the Death of DuPont
- reasonable consumers read promotion terms on a gambling app, court rules
- Third Circuit affirms disgorgement award in “Made in the USA” case
- despite rejecting Lanham Act PI, court enjoins D from making negative statements about P in public if prospective customers might see
Recent Comments
Archives
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: false advertising
allegedly false claims for compounded weight loss drugs didn’t plausibly threaten Eli Lilly’s reputation
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Mochi Health Corp., 2025 WL 2998166, No. 25-cv-03534-JSC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2025) Another of the cases in which Eli Lilly’s attempts to protect its GLP-antagonist market do surprisingly badly, once again highlighting the higher … Continue reading
Coinbase can’t force claim for injunctive relief into arbitration
Khan v. Coinbase, Inc., 2025 WL 2985378, No. A172063, — Cal.Rptr.3d —-, (Ct. App. Oct. 23, 2025) The appellate court affirmed the denial of Coinbase’s attempt to send Khan’s false advertising claims to arbitration, holding that Khan sought public injunctive … Continue reading
“GMO-free” avocado oil isn’t deceptive even if all avocado oil is GMO-free
Whiteside v. Chosen Foods, LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 2460192, No. 3:25-cv-00481-CAB-DDL (S.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2025) xkcd, “Free” XKCD may hate it, but the law will allow it. Plaintiff alleged that defendants misleadingly advertised their avocado oil by … Continue reading
Another “natural” claim proceeds for pet food labeled “natural + vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients”
Cobovic v. Mars Petcare US, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, No. 24-CV-7730 (ARR) (JAM) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 20, 2025) Cobovic alleged that the use of the word “natural” on the front label pet food was false and misleading under NY law because … Continue reading
claims about scientific studies might imply FDA approval
BioGaia USA, LLC v. Probiotiv Naturals LLC, 2025 WL 2946910, No. CV 25-3592 PA (MBKx) (C.D. Cal. Sept. 5, 2025) BioGaia sued Probiotiv – a competitor in the sale of priobiotic dietary supplements for oral health, for false advertising; Probiotiv … Continue reading
New Jersey would not recognize a common law tort of false advertising, says fed ct
Pim Brands, Inc. v. New Cibo Vita LLC, No. 25-cv-01418(MEF)(AME), 2025 WL 2938602 (D.N.J. Oct. 16, 2025) The parties compete in the market for yogurt-covered fruit snacks, and the plaintiff alleged false advertising, including unfair competition claim under New Jersey … Continue reading
California’s limits on use of “doctor” in healthcare settings are constitutional regulations of commercial speech
Palmer v. Bonta, 2025 WL 2882948, No. EDCV 23-1047 JGB (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Sept. 19, 2025) Plaintiffs alleged that California Business and Professions Code § 2054(a), on its face and as enforced, violates the First Amendment because it provides, in … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged commercial speech, false advertising, first amendment
Leave a comment
court allows false advertising claim based on manipulation of Amazon’s “variation” system
Corsair Gaming, Inc. v. Choice Electronics Inc., 2025 WL 2822691, No. 5:25-cv-00045-BLF (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2025) Corsair sued Choice for alleged infringement by selling used, unauthorized, or counterfeit Corsair computer/gaming products. This opinion deals with Choice’s counterclaims. The false … Continue reading
court rejects affiliation confusion theory for lack of harm, declines to order tarps over P’s goods
Survitec Survival Prods., Inc. v. Fire Protection Service, Inc., 2025 WL 2782332, No. H-21-312 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2025) This case demonstrates exactly why harm to the plaintiff should be explicitly a part of a trademark case that relies on … Continue reading
Second Circuit reverses literal falsity finding based on dispute over meaning of “brand”
Zesty Paws LLC v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., — F.4th —-, No. 24-1810, 2025 WL 2810078 (2d Cir. Oct. 3, 2025) The court of appeals reverses the district court opinion discussed here, which had granted a preliminary injunction on Zesty’s Lanham … Continue reading