-
Recent Posts
- WIPIP Panel 6: Design and Brand; Protectable Subject Matter; Copyright Theory and Doctrine II
- WIPIP Panel 5: Trademark Doctrine
- WIPIP Panel 4: Emerging Technologies
- “shipping protection fee” providing no extra protection was plausibly misleading drip pricing
- WIPIP Panel 3: Deepfakes, Celebrities, and Movies
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: false advertising
infant/child painkiller case dismissed as preempted
Youngblood v. CVS Pharmacy, 2021 WL 3700256, No. 2:20-cv-06251-MCS-MRW (C.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2021) Another infant/children acetaminophen consumer protection case. This one dismisses the claims as completely preempted by the FTCA. Plaintiffs argued that their claims are consistent with the … Continue reading
two Zillow false advertising cases, divergent outcomes
REX – Real Estate Exchange Inc. v. Zillow Inc., No. C21-312 TSZ, 2021 WL 3930694 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 2, 2021) Rex sued Zillow and the National Association of Realtors for antitrust and false advertising violations. Surprisingly, the antitrust claims survive, … Continue reading
“tested” can misleadingly imply high performance on test
Carder v. Graco Children’s Products, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2021 WL 3909953, No. 2:20-CV-00137-LMM (N.D. Ga. Aug. 31, 2021) Plaintiffs from fifteen states alleged that Graco made false and misleading representations about two models of children’s car seats, specifically marketing … Continue reading
slack fill and “healthy” claims unite in one case
Stewart v. Kodiak Cakes, LLC, 2021 WL 1698695, No. 19-cv-2454-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2021) Plaintiffs alleged that Kodiak was liable for “(1) non-functional slack fill and (2) deceptive marketing practices” for its pancake and waffle mixes. Defendant misleadingly … Continue reading
Journalism about investment isn’t commercial speech
Crash Proof Retirement, LLC v. Price, 2021 WL 1387501, No. 2:20-cv-05906-JDW (E.D. Pa. Apr. 13, 2021) Competing in the marketplace of ideas can ground a defamation claim, but not a false advertising claim. Crash Proof, which offers retirement planning counseling, … Continue reading
competitor has state, federal standing to challenge nondisparaging false ads
Jerome’s Furniture Warehouse v. Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc., 2021 WL 1541649, No. 20CV1765-GPC(BGS) (S.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2021) Jerome’s alleged false advertising under state and federal law based on Ashley’s alleged false advertising “intended to deceive customers into falsely believing … Continue reading
Apple’s “buy” button that doesn’t result in ownership may mislead consumers
Andino v. Apple, Inc., 2021 WL 1549667, No. 2:20-cv-01628-JAM-AC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2021) iTunes allows consumers to “Rent” or “Buy” movies, television shows, music and other content. Renting is less expensive; buying leads the content to appear in a … Continue reading
Coffee lawsuits brewing
Two cases, suggesting a newly discovered litigation vein. Ashton v. J.M. Smucker Co., No. EDCV 20-992 JGB (SHKx), 2020 WL 8575140 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2020) Plaintiffs alleged that representations on the front of Folgers ground coffee cans, including “MAKES … Continue reading
Is disgorgement the new normal in Lanham Act cases?
Grasshopper House, LLC v. Clean & Sober Media, LLC, 2021 WL 3702243, No. 19-56008, No. 19-56072, — Fed.Appx. —- (9th Cir. Aug. 20, 2021) The TMA’s injunctive relief changes are probably going to make it even more clear that courts … Continue reading
Pandemic ski resort closures allow both contract and advertising claims
Goodrich v. Alterra Mountain Co., 2021 WL 2633326, No. 20-cv-01057-RM-SKC (D. Colo. Jun. 25, 2021) Unlike the education cases so far, this pandemic case sustains both consumer protection and contract claims. “Plaintiffs purchased Ikon ski passes for the 2019-20 ski … Continue reading