Tag Archives: false advertising

claims about others’ patent infringement can be factual, commercial speech subject to Lanham Act

Global Tech Led, LLC v. HiLumz International Corp., 2017 WL 588669, No. 15–cv–553 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 14, 2017) The parties, former business partners, now compete in the retrofit LED lighting industry. Global Tech sued defendants for patent infringement. HiLumz counterclaimed … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Doctor’s evaluation of another doctor’s treatment isn’t commercial speech

Tobinick v. Novella, No. 15-14889 (11th Cir. Feb. 15, 2017) Ultimately, despite a long battle, this is a relatively easy case about “the medical viability of a novel use for a particular drug.”  Dr. Tobinick (plaintiff, along with related entities) … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

calling a rival “imitation” is neither defamatory nor confusing

Baltimore Sports & Social Club, Inc. v. Sport & Social, LLC, 2017 WL 526499, No. 16–cv–02953 (D. Md. Jan. 6, 2017)   BSSC logo Sport & Social logos BSSC initiated suit, claiming that Sport & Social’s use of the marks … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

P&G fails to clean up “natural” suit over baby wipes

Brenner v. Procter & Gamble Co., No. 16-1093, 2016 WL 8192946 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2016) Brenner sued on behalf of a putative nationwide class and a California subclass of those who purchased Pampers “Natural Clean” Baby Wipes.  The individual … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Advertising a phone with an unauthorized screenshot of an app doesn’t violate the Lanham Act under Dastar

Appjigger GmbH v. BLU Products, Inc., 2016 WL 4119720, No. 15–22313 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 7, 2016) Appjigger makes apps, and has an exclusive license for the WP CLOCK software app, which is available both to end users and also for … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Failure to show causation leads court to overturn jury verdict against false advertising

A.L.S. Enters., Inc. v. Robinson Outdoor Prods., LLC, No. 14-CV-500, 2017 WL 393307 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 30, 2017) ALS sued Robinson for false advertising of Robinson’s Trinity scent-control hunting clothing. The jury returned a verdict for ALS, awarding ALS $1.3 … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Amazon escapes liability for ads & emails touting vendors’ infringing products

Lasoff v. Amazon.com Inc, 2017 WL 372948, No. C16-151 (W.D. Wash. Jan. 26, 2017) Lasoff owns Ingrass, which sells artificial turf and related products.  He sold through Amazon, but in 2013 his sales allegedly began to plummet, both on his … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Disgorgement isn’t distinguishable from restitution in ordinary consumer protection case

Brazil v. Dole Packaged Foods, LLC, 660 Fed.Appx. 531 (9th Cir. 2016) Brazil brought the usual California claims, alleging that defendants deceptively described their fruit products as “All Natural Fruit.” Brazil property alleged that Dole’s labels were deceptive given that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Another “omissions about slave labor” case fails in Cal.

Sud v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 15-cv-03783, 2017 WL 345994 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2017) Sud brought the usual California claims based on allegations that Costco sold prawns for which the supply chain was tainted by slavery, human trafficking, and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

False claims of discounts cause Article III injury

Morrow v. Ann Inc., 2017 WL 363001, No. 16-CV-3340 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2017) Plaintiffs alleged that Ann deceptively advertised merchandise sold in its Ann Taylor Factory and LOFT Outlet stores by falsely claiming on its sales tags, in-store signage, and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment