-
Recent Posts
- WIPIP Panel 6: Design and Brand; Protectable Subject Matter; Copyright Theory and Doctrine II
- WIPIP Panel 5: Trademark Doctrine
- WIPIP Panel 4: Emerging Technologies
- “shipping protection fee” providing no extra protection was plausibly misleading drip pricing
- WIPIP Panel 3: Deepfakes, Celebrities, and Movies
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: first amendment
CustomMade doesn’t know about USOC’s anti-free-speech stance
Or has taken Nick Fury’s excellent approach. Consider this email below: pure truth, from all that appears. Even assuming SFAA is still good law, shouldn’t the First Amendment protect this speech? From the Olympics to the jeweler’s bench: Nana Smith competed … Continue reading
IPSC Breakout Session III
IP & Privacy Exploring Privacy as Commons Katherine Strandburg & Brett Frischmann Knowledge production/privacy as highly related, not orthogonal/opposed. Knowledge production framework as a way of doing descriptive empirical case studies of how privacy works in context, which can aid … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged dmca, first amendment, IPSC Breakout Session III conferences, privacy, trademark
Leave a comment
Reading list: the First Amendment and the FDA
Christopher Robertson, A Trojan Horse? How Expansion of the First Amendment Threatens Much More than the Regulation of Off-Label Drugs, forthcoming, __ Ohio State Law Journal __ (2017) Abstract: Scholars, advocates, and courts have begun to recognize a First Amendment … Continue reading
Commercial speech: strategic issues
Strategic Issues: What questions are we asking now? Where is the law going? Moderator: Timothy L. Alger, Greenberg Traurig LLP: In today’s economy, what isn’t an ad? Is the death of the commercial/noncommercial distinction inevitable? A: depends on … Continue reading
Brand journalism: sponsored content/the 1A
Brand Journalism, Sponsored Content and the First Amendment Moderator: Scott Dailard, Cooley LLP Mary K. Engle, Federal Trade Commission, Associate Director, Division of Advertising Practices: We’re going to proceed as if there is a commercial/noncommercial divide. To hold … Continue reading
The definition of commercial speech
Commercial Speech: The Definition Matters Moderators: Chris Beall, Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz LLP and Bruce Johnson, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Steven G. Brody, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP: We barely spoke about the definition of commercial speech. Why? … Continue reading
The commercial/noncommercial boundary
The Shifting Boundaries Between Commercial & Non-Commercial Speech Moderator: Vince Blasi, Corliss Lamont Professor of Civil Liberties, Columbia Law School Tamara Piety, Phyllis Hurley Frey Professor of Law, University of Tulsa College of Law: Book, Brandishing the First Amendment. … Continue reading
Judge Alex Kozinski likes free speech and Lochner
Commercial Speech Conference, Abrams Institute Interview: Who’s Afraid of Commercial Speech? — 26 Years Later Ron Collins (Harold S. Shefelman Scholar, University of Washington, School of Law) & Judge Alex Kozinski (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth … Continue reading
Amicus in Lanham Act/commercial speech case
Mark McKenna just filed this brief on behalf of law professors, including me, supporting a simple resolution of Tobinick v. Novella, which should be an easy case (and in easy cases it may be tempting to sweep too broadly). from … Continue reading
Consultant’s speech to potential customers wasn’t pure scientific speech protected by First Amendment
Underground Solutions, Inc. v. Palermo, 2016 WL 2866099, No. 13 C 8407 (N.D. Ill. May 17, 2016) Related decisions discussed from 2012, 2014, and 2015. Plaintiff UGSI sued Palermo for trade libel and false advertising under California and federal … Continue reading