-
Recent Posts
- Another digital “buy” button case survives motion to dismiss
- Supplement guide was plausibly an agent of supplement company; direct and secondary liability available
- “GoodBelly” and “GoodHealth” plus label plausibly communicate net digestive health benefits
- Call for papers: Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable 2023
- Today at noon EST: free HLS webinar on developing professionalism in students
Recent Comments
Archives
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: part 4 conferences
A Celebration of the Work of Wendy Gordon, part 4
A Natural Right to Copy by Glynn Lunney, Texas A&M University School of Law Thanks to the great women who encouraged intellectual honesty in topics and analysis of topics, not just Gordon but also Litman, Samuelson, others. Gordon doesn’t agree w/how far … Continue reading
TM scholars’ roundtable, part 4
Session 2, Cont’d Mid-Point Discussants: Mike Grynberg Belmora may do very little. But: Belmora may be bad if it discards important checks, one of which might be territoriality. Another idea: arguably undermines systematicity of TM, its existence as an … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged part 4 conferences, TM Scholars' Roundtable, trademark
Leave a comment
Notre Dame Scope Roundtable, part 4
Chris Buccafusco & Mark Lemley, Screening Functionality Commentators: Abraham Drassinower and Jim Gibson Gibson: regime shopping is even more troublesome than scope problems in one regime. Design patents seem to exist purely for regime shopping; everyone wants a patent right … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, design patent, Notre Dame Scope Roundtable, part 4 conferences, patent, trademark
Leave a comment
TM scholars’ roundtable, part 4
Research directions in Trademark Law 2017-2018 Discussants: Bill McGeveran: History of scholarly productivity coming 1-2 years after the roundtables as seeds germinated. Agenda-setting: boundary issues and registration. Territorial/product dimensions; the consumers; design—picking up on something already in the air, but … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged part 4 conferences, TM Scholars' Roundtable, trademark
Leave a comment
TM roundtable, part 4
From last time: RT: I was thinking as Silbey was talking that you’re convincing me that TM should be a particular kind of anticopying regime (though, as w/patent, knowledge need not be required, at least for double identity). And that … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged design patent, part 4 conferences, TM roundtable, trademark
Leave a comment
Notre Dame Deception Roundtable, part 4
Session 4 – Contracts and Securities Discussion Leaders: Greg Klass, Ann Lipton, Andrea Matwyshyn Matwyshyn: there’s a duty to perform in good faith in the US, but no duty to negotiate in good faith. If you have an integration … Continue reading
Notre Dame Roundtable on Drassinower, Part 4
Session IV – Subject Matter and Limitations • Rebecca Tushnet Drassinower defines trademark as the right to completely control the meaning of a mark as applied to a good or service: radically unidirectional, like a one-way traffic sign, … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, Notre Dame Roundtable on Drassinower, part 4 conferences, patent, trademark
Leave a comment
ISHTIP at Penn, part 4
Session 2 | Dina Leytes (Griesing Law, LLC), Moderator Lord Eldon, Lord Byron, and the Public Domain Gary Dyer (Cleveland State University) Commentator | Simon Stern (University of Toronto) Byron’s strategies to deal with Eldon’s doctrine that created … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, ISHTIP at Penn, part 4 conferences, patent
Leave a comment