-
Recent Posts
- it’s hard to get rid of a foreign TM owner’s complaint at the motion to dismiss stage despite territoriality
- dct strikes down California’s new recyclability law on vagueness/1A grounds
- look, there’s a lawsuit: bad claim against comedian leads to anti-SLAPP award
- 5th Circuit puts its own spin on the server test
- weak infringement case + bad litigation conduct = fee shift for anticompetitive suit over descriptive term
Recent Comments
Archives
- September 2026
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: procedure
9th Circuit easily rejects In re GNC’s “all scientists must agree” standard for falsity
Sonner v. Schwabe North America, Inc., — F.3d —-, No. 17-55261, 2018 WL 6786616 (9th Cir. Dec. 26, 2018) Happy holidays to me! Sonner sued the sellers of two Ginkgold nutritional supplements for violations of the UCL and CLRA and … Continue reading
Pleading compliance w/test rules doesn’t plausibly plead compliance for consumer plaintiffs
Anglin v. Edgewell Personal Care Co., 2018 WL 6434424, No. 4:18-CV-00639-NCC (E.D. Mo. Dec. 7, 2018) Are there people who believe that Twiqbal improved consistency? Because I do not understand the level of detail required. Here, the magistrate holds that … Continue reading
Preserve challenged ads/social media posts after receiving a C&D or risk sanctions
Nutrition Distribution LLC v. Pep Research, LLC, No. 16CV2328-WQH(BLM), 2018 WL 3769162 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2018) (magistrate judge) A spoliation/false advertising issue. “While Defendants produced some social media documents, the production did not include Facebook or Twitter posts relating … Continue reading
Blast from the past: false price claims insufficiently pled
Ashley Furniture Indus., Inc. v. American Signature, Inc., 2015 WL 12999664, No. 11-cv-427 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 12, 2015) At this point I will just institute a “blast from the past” category for Westclip. This one made it because of a … Continue reading
Court finds Lanham Act laches on the pleadings given p’s delay
Lifeway Foods, Inc. v. Millenium Products, Inc., No. CV 16-7099-R, 2016 WL 7336721, — F. Supp. 3d – (C.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2016) Lifeway sued defendants under federal and state false advertising law for allegedly selling a product that didn’t … Continue reading
membership in swingers club not (yet) disclosed in Lanham Act case
Edmondson v. Velvet Lifestyles, LLC, No. 15-24442-CIV, 2016 WL 5682591 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 3, 2016) I don’t get to blog discovery disputes often; that this one is unresolved is frustrating, but the court asks useful questions. “May Plaintiffs pursuing a … Continue reading
failure to speak can be advertising but not presentations to trainers
WIKA Instrument I, LP v. Ashcroft, Inc., 2015 WL 11199059, No. 13-CV-43 (N.D. Ga. Jul. 10, 2016) WIKA sued Ashcroft, a competing maker of pressure gauges, for false advertising and related claims, and Ashcroft counterclaimed similarly. WIKA sells the XSEL … Continue reading
Minimal pleading of responsibility suffices to evade 230 dismissal
Congoo, LLC v. Revcontent LLC, 2016 WL 1547171, No. 16-401 (D.N.J. Apr. 15, 2016) The parties compete in the market for native advertising. Congoo alleged that Revcontent caused false/misleading native advertising to be published. Revcontent asserted §230 immunity. The … Continue reading
Do implicit falsity plaintiffs have to plead the existence of a survey?
Vincent v. Utah Plastic Surgery Society, — Fed.Appx. —-, 2015 WL 5090868, No. 13–4146 (10th Cir. Aug. 31, 2015) Plaintiffs (cosmetic surgeons) sued defendants (plastic surgeons) for false advertising under the Lanham Act and monopolization under the Sherman Act … Continue reading