Tag Archives: remedies

TM Scholars’ roundtable, part 5

Session 3: Remedies In recent years, trademark scholarship has focused largely on questions of subject matter and scope, including much critical assessment of standards for infringement and dilution.  In this brief discussion, we will turn our attention to remedies, and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Private Law & IP, Remedies and Prizes

Session 7: Remedies and Prizes Moderator: Chief Judge Patti B. Saris (D. Mass.): 50% of all claim constructions are reversed, and 80% of all damages.  So judges are interested in improvements.   John M. Golden, “Reasonable Certainty in Contract and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Private Law and Intellectual Property conference at Harvard

Opening Remarks: Henry Smith—exploring the connections between private law and IP.   Session 1: Entitlement Design Moderator: Rebecca L. Tushnet Speakers and Papers/Commentators: Tun-Jen Chiang, “The Paradox of IP”: A paper looking for a theory.  Why do we have an … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Anonymous defamatory posts are “advertising or promotion” under Lanham Act

Romeo & Juliette Laser Hair Removal, Inc. v. Assara I LLC, 2016 WL 815205, No. 8-cv-0442 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 29, 2016)   R&J sued Assara and a number of related people eight years ago.  The parties compete to offer laser hair … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

seller-incentivized reviews might be misleading (and violate FTC guidelines)

Vitamins Online, Inc. v. HeartWise, Inc., 2016 WL 538458, No. 13-CV-982 (D. Utah Feb. 9, 2016)   The parties (plaintiff d/b/a NutriGold and defendant d/b/a NatureWise) make and sell dietary supplements online, including on Amazon; their competing products  include one … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

California claims for injunctive relief can’t be remanded after CAFA removal

Mezzadri v. Medical Depot, Inc., 113 F. Supp. 3d 1061 (S.D. Cal. 2015)   The rule against claim-splitting clashes with the injustice of the ability of a defendant to destroy a form of relief by removing a complaint from state … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Showing irreparable harm isn’t easy

Pruvit Ventures, Inc. v. ForeverGreen International LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2015 WL 9876952 No. 15-CV-571 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2015) (magistrate judge)   Defendants moved for a preliminary injunction on their counterclaims involving dietary suppplements.  Defendant Axcess is the exclusive … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Selfie restraint: It’s hard to show fame and irreparable harm

ArcSoft, Inc. v. Cyberlink Corp., 2015 WL 9455516, No. 15-cv-03707 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2015)   ArcSoft makes the Perfect365 selfie editing app, and sued defendants for infringing and diluting the trademarks/trade dress of that app with their YouCam Perfect … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Court rejects recall when falsely advertising defendant already notified customers

Riverdale Mills Corp. v. Cavatorta North America, Inc., 2015 WL 7295541, No. 4:15-CV-40132 (Nov. 18, 2015)   Riverdale makes welded wire mesh for use in marine traps using a “galvanized after welding” (GAW) process followed by a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Christmas in November: No TRO for alleged false advertising because no showing of irreparable harm

Balsam Brands Inc. v. Cinmar, LLC, 2015 WL 7015417, No. 15-cv-04829 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2015)   Balsam sought a TRO based on claimed patent rights in an invertible artificial Christmas tree, the “Flip Tree,” that includes a “pivot joint” … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment