Tag Archives: standing

Inter American Convention allows claims that Lanham Act makes dubious after Abitron; but what about Article III?

Posted on July 3, 2023 by rtushnet

Industria De Alimentos Zenu S.A.S. v. Latinfood U.S. Corp., No. 16-6576 (KM) (MAH), 2023 WL 4200169, — F. Supp. 3d — (D.N.J. Jun. 27, 2023)   Industria sued Latinfood for trademark and copyright infringement; Latinfood counterclaimed for tortious interference against … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

materiality dispute avoids sj in literal falsity case (also no seller standing against ingredient supplier)

Posted on June 26, 2023 by rtushnet

World Nutrition Inc. v. Advanced Enzymes USA, 2023 WL 4105345, No. CV-19-00265-PHX-GMS (D. Ariz. Jun. 21, 2023) WNI and defendants AST/Specialty sell enzyme supplement products. WNI and AST sell directly to consumers, while Specialty is a wholesaler that sells to … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Target of TM takedown notices has Lanham Act standing to challenge automated notice provider’s ads claiming accuracy

Posted on June 19, 2023 by rtushnet

Unlimited Cellular, INC. v. Red Points Solutions SL, 2023 WL 4029824, No. 21-cv-10638 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 14, 2023) Unlimited, an “online non-authorized reseller of consumer products,” sued Red Points for defamation, tortious interference, and false advertising under state and federal … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

if an allegedly falsely advertised product isn’t useless, P may have standing to seek injunctive relief

Posted on May 19, 2023 by rtushnet

Perez v. Bath & Body Works, LLC, No. 21-cv-05606-BLF, 2023 WL 3467207 (N.D. Cal. May 15, 2023) Interesting analysis of standing for injunctive relief: Where the product is a useful one, the court finds standing based on a desire to … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

in a Lanham Act (false advertising) case, presumptions cannot substitute for Article III injury

Posted on April 26, 2023 by rtushnet

TocMail, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., — F.4th —-, 2023 WL 3070085, No. 22-10223 (11th Cir. Apr. 25 2023) Previous district court opinion allowing Lanham Act false advertising claims to proceed against Microsoft; applying the Article III analysis that doesn’t (yet?) … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

consumer class settlement can’t include injunctive relief unless there’s Art. III standing to seek injunctive relief

Posted on April 20, 2023 by rtushnet

Williams v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC, — F.4th —-, 2023 WL 2906311, No. 22-11232 (11th Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) The court of appeals reversed approval of a settlement that would have provided injunctive relief and up to $8 million in monetary … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

paying a referral fee is a consumer injury, not a competitor injury, for Lanham Act standing purposes

Posted on April 20, 2023 by rtushnet

Lewis v. Acuity Real Estate Services, LLC, 63 F.4th 1114 (6th Cir. 2023) Acuity operates a website that connects people looking to buy or sell homes with a local real-estate agent in their area. Acuity offers its services for free … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Ice Cube’s case against Robinhood melts again

Posted on October 7, 2021 by rtushnet

Jackson v. Robinhood Markets, Inc., No. 21-cv-02304-LB (N.D. Cal. Sept. 20, 2021) Previously, the court dismissed Ice Cube’s ROP and false endorsement claims for lack of standing because pleading an appearance in a financial newsletter does not suffice to plead … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

No organizational standing from mere conflict with consumer protection mission

Posted on October 5, 2021 by rtushnet

In Defense of Animals v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., 2021 WL 4243391, No. 20-cv-05293-RS (N.D. Cal. Sept. 17, 2021) Let’s play the fun game “which of these statements about standing should make IP people nervous?” Previously, Friends of the Earth and … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

No organizational standing where advocacy campaigns didn’t change

Posted on September 30, 2021 by rtushnet

Friends of the Earth v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., 992 F.3d 939 (9th Cir. 2021) Although the animal/farm advocacy organization plaintiffs won some early skirmishes, they faltered on lack of organizational standing against a poultry producer to bring consumer protection claims. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment