-
Recent Posts
- Fiskars can’t cut down $1.4 million disgorgement award
- Star Wars mod wars: claims over a touted but unreleased mod have to go to trial
- Reading list: consumer protection and the industries who regularly sue their regulators
- claims about game provider’s bot use in “fair” and “skill-based” games must go to trial
- bad Lanham Act claim, swept up with bad patent claim, triggers Rule 11 sanctions
Recent Comments
Archives
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: surveys
breast pump rules: Think Green’s trade dress claims against Medela proceed to trial
Think Green Ltd. v. Medela AG, 2025 WL 1826137, No. 21 CV 5445 (N.D. Ill. Jul. 2, 2025) Think Green sued Medela for infringing its trade dress in its breast pump, as well as false advertising claims that were quickly … Continue reading
ambiguity in consumer class actions v. the Lanham Act: convergence or divergence?
Slaten v. Christian Dior Perfumes, LLC, 2025 WL 1840026, No. 23-cv-00409-JSC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2025) The concept of ambiguity is now on a path to become as entrenched in consumer protection cases as in Lanham Act cases. My thinking … Continue reading
Southern discomfort: class certified over malt beverage dressed like Southern Comfort whiskey
Andrews v. Sazerac Co., 2025 WL 1808797, No. 23-cv-1060 (AS) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 1, 2025) Plaintiffs alleged that Sazerac deceived consumers by selling a malt beverage that looks like Southern Comfort whiskey but in fact contains only “whiskey flavor.” The court … Continue reading
Scotts loses trade dress claim over green & gold for Miracle-Gro
Scotts Co. v. Procter & Gamble Co., 2025 WL 1779167, No. 2:24-cv-4199 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 27, 2025) A different Scotts trade dress claim than the one I blogged last year. While it’s hard to get rid of trademark claims on … Continue reading
materiality surveys may not need controls
In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig., No. 14-MD-2542 (VSB), 2025 WL 354671 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2025) This is a ruling on 19 motions to exclude expert testimony in this case, which is mostly an antitrust case; I … Continue reading
annoyingly redacted opinion finds Block falsely advertised versus TurboTax
Intuit Inc. v. HRB Tax Gp., Inc., 2024 WL 5320392, No. 5:24-cv-00253-BLF (N.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2024) Intuit, which makes TurboTax and has had some advertising troubles of its own (hey, check out the IRS Free File program, for taxpayers … Continue reading
materiality survey is in–even with 20 industry employees as respondents
Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC v. Under Armour, INC., 2025 WL 82336, No. 2:20-CV-664-NR (W.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 2025) MET sued Under Armour for multiple things, including false advertising, and here MET sought to exclude the testimony of Under Armour’s consumer … Continue reading
Court accepts survey with disclaimer control that causes 38% confusion
Another ruling in the PNC v. Plaid case: PNC Financial Services Gp. v. Plaid Inc., 2024 WL 3691607, No. 2:20-cv-1977 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2024) Daubert motions for this case. I’ll only discuss the stuff I find interesting. Kivetz … Continue reading
Plaintiffs win partial summary judgment on falsity/materiality in “made in US” tea case
Banks v. R.C. Bigelow, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-06208-DDP-RAOx, 2024 WL 3330554 (C.D. Cal. Jul. 8, 2024) The court here grants the consumer plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on their theory of falsity of Bigelow’s “manufactured in the USA” claim for … Continue reading
“#1 Brand” claim was literally false because of apples-to-oranges comparison
Zesty Paws LLC v. Nutramax Labs., Inc., No. 23 Civ. 10849 (LGS), 2024 WL 2853622 (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 4, 2024) Finding Zesty Paws’ “#1 Brand” claim literally false, the court grants a preliminary injunction despite Zesty Paws’ attempt to create a … Continue reading