Tag Archives: trademark

court allows Nike’s legal theories and most of its expert testimony against StockX’s resales/NFTs

Posted on July 15, 2024 by rtushnet

Nike, Inc. v. StockX LLC, 2024 WL 3361411, No. 22-CV-0983 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 10, 2023) Nike sued over StockX’s use of Nike trademarks on StockX NFTs without Nike’s consent and alleged sales of counterfeit Nike sneakers despite allegedly guaranteeing that … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Team Blood Donor

Posted on July 15, 2024 by rtushnet

 Spotted in the wild: Team Blood Donor “cooling towel” with five colored, overlapping blood drop outlines on label Inova says, “[t]he Olympic-themed gifts add a fun and engaging element to the donation experience, making it more likely for donors to … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Slow fashion: checkerboard design plausibly infringes another checkerboard design

Posted on July 3, 2024 by rtushnet

Hian v. Louis Vuitton USA Inc, 2024 WL 3237591, No. 22-3742 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 28, 2024) The court tosses out most of an independent fashion designer’s claims against LVMH, while preserving one copyright infringement claim based on a distorted checkerboard … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Initial thoughts on Elster

Posted on June 17, 2024 by rtushnet

In part so as not to repudiate big chunks of Tam/Brunetti, the Court instead delivers a major rebuke to Reed v. Town of Gilbert, 576 U.S. 155 (2015) (content-based regulation triggers strict scrutiny), except it doesn’t tell us the scope … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Reminder on Call for Papers: Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable 2024

Posted on May 13, 2024 by rtushnet

 The Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable co-hosted by Harvard, NYU, and the University of Pennsylvania will take place this year at Harvard. The Roundtable is designed to be a forum for the discussion of current trademark, false advertising, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Hetronic remand: the continued rise of “use”

Posted on April 29, 2024 by rtushnet

Hetronic International, Inc. v. Hetronic Germany GmbH, — F.4th —-, Nos. 20-6057 & 20-6100, 2024 WL 1724995 (10th Cir. Apr. 23, 2024) Hetronic has US registrations; Abitron sold Hetronic-branded products without permission to customers around the world, including in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Good Meat is descriptive for sustainable meat-related services, plausibly deceptive for lab-grown meat

Posted on April 15, 2024 by rtushnet

Good Meat Project v. GOOD Meat, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —- , 2024 WL 1083462,  No. 23-cv-04145-RFL (N.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2024) GMP is a nonprofit focused on sustainable butchery and meat production practices. It provides farmers, ranchers, and butchers with … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

RAW power: over dissent, 9th Circuit orders trial on infringement, cancellation of TM applications

Posted on April 5, 2024 by rtushnet

BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP v. Central Coast Agriculture, Inc., — F.4th —-, 2024 WL 1356981, Nos. 22-16190, 22-16281 (9th Cir. Apr. 1, 2023) Over a dissent, the panel reverses the grant of summary judgment on noninfringement, reasoning that the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

My latest acquisition

Posted on April 4, 2024 by rtushnet

 My son informs me that this is an “illegal build” but I like it anyway. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2024/04/my-latest-acquisition.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Nominative fair use requires D to prevail on all 3 factors in 9th Circuit, district court concludes

Posted on March 21, 2024 by rtushnet

Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Luxury Home Buyers, LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, No.: 2:20-cv-01344-JAD-MDC (D. Nev. Jan. 16, 2024) The court grants plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of parts of this case, discussed previously. Axon alleged that LHB infringed Axon’s “Taser” mark. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment