-
Recent Posts
- WIPIP Panel 6: Design and Brand; Protectable Subject Matter; Copyright Theory and Doctrine II
- WIPIP Panel 5: Trademark Doctrine
- WIPIP Panel 4: Emerging Technologies
- “shipping protection fee” providing no extra protection was plausibly misleading drip pricing
- WIPIP Panel 3: Deepfakes, Celebrities, and Movies
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: trademark
“TM-compliant” ads not shown to be nominative fair use
World Axe Throwing League, Inc. v. Cold Steel Inc., 2023 WL 2372059, No. 2:20−cv−11407 JAK (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2023) Plaintiffs sued defendants for state and federal trademark infringement and related claims. Plaintiff WATL is allegedly the preeminent governing … Continue reading
UCL claim could be based on lost opportunity to register trademark
Zamfir v. CasperLabs, LLC, 2023 WL 2415262, No. 21-CV-474 TWR (AHG) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2023) Previous ruling. Zamfir, a blockchain researcher, alleged that he was known for his proof-of-stake (PoS) protocol; he adopted the name “Casper” for the research … Continue reading
Trademark question of the day, Harvard edition
When I was younger, I had a shirt that had VE RI OLD in the traditional Harvard shield configuration. The local burrito place just rolled these out, and I love them: from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2023/02/trademark-question-of-day-harvard.html
Fourteenth Trademark Scholars’ Roundtable, part 3 (Evidence)
Changes in Trademark Law and Evidentiary Rules Introduction: Jake Linford Before courts admitted surveys routinely, they were concerned about hearsay. Sometimes rejecting surveys seems like judicial notice—“cola” as generic; the court doesn’t want to hear contrary survey evidence. Some objections … Continue reading
Fourteenth Trademark Scholars Roundtable, part 2
Session 2: Responding to Anachronisms Introduction: Mike Grynberg VIP may tell us a lot about what the potentials are. Incrementalism: read Lanham Act along with other things like its common law foundations and First Amendment principles—not empty formalism; recognize normative … Continue reading
Fourteenth Trademark Scholars’ Roundtable: Are Key Trademark and Unfair Competition Doctrines Anachronistic?
UCLA School of Law Mark Janis: 1st day of TM: students’ experience of brands as used by owners & 3rd parties is so disconnected from the historical traditions of TM. Anachronism may give away too much by suggesting the cause … Continue reading
facially plausible false advertising claim can be added to TM complaint
In case you’re looking for a roadmap for leave to amend: Ideavillage Products Corp. v. Copper Compression Brands LLC, 2021 WL 5013799, No. 20 Civ. 4604 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 27, 2021) Ideavillage sued CCB for trademark infringement and false designation … Continue reading
Puzzlingly calling a venue name a “title,” court nonetheless rejects claim against MTV show
MGFB Properties, Inc. v. ViacomCBS INC., 2021 WL 4843905, NO. 5:19cv257-RH-MJF (N.D. Fla. Sept. 22, 2021) The Flora-Bama lounge and entertainment complext is “regionally famous,” and MTV created a national TV series, MTV Floribama Shore. The district court granted summary … Continue reading
Disney’s Toy Story 4 daredevil not legally risky
K & K Prods., Inc. v. Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures, No. 2:20-CV-1753 JCM (NJK) (D. Nev. Sept. 23, 2021) Evel Knievel was a famous motorcycle daredevil with an “iconic wardrobe: a white jumpsuit embellished only by star-spangled red, white, … Continue reading
Ice Cube’s case against Robinhood melts again
Jackson v. Robinhood Markets, Inc., No. 21-cv-02304-LB (N.D. Cal. Sept. 20, 2021) Previously, the court dismissed Ice Cube’s ROP and false endorsement claims for lack of standing because pleading an appearance in a financial newsletter does not suffice to plead … Continue reading