Tag Archives: trademark

False endorsement remains broader than many state ROP laws

Walkowicz v. American Girl Brands, LLC, 2021 WL 510729, No. 20-cv-374-jdp (W.D. Wis. Feb. 11, 2021) Lucianne Walkowicz “has achieved a measure of celebrity as an astronomer,” and contended that  defendants misappropriated distinctive aspects of their personal identity into a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

consumer’s bid to enjoin Redbubble’s sale of “counterfeits” fails

Vinluan-Jularbal v. Redbubble, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00573-JAM-JDP, 2021 WL 4286539 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 21, 2021) Plaintiff thinks Redbubble sells a lot of “counterfeits” and wants that enjoined under the UCL and CLRA. Despite ruling in her favor on a lot of … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Laches bars TM claims but what counts as “Made in the USA” merits trial

Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. J-B Weld Co., 2021 WL 4310576, No. 3:19-cv-1434 (JAM) (D. Conn. Sept. 22, 2021) The parties compete in the market for “chemical bonding products—like epoxies, adhesives, threadlockers, gasket makers, and silicone sealants—that someone might buy … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Dastar doesn’t bar allegedly false advertising about source of planned development services

LStar Development Gp., Inc. v. Vining, 2021 WL 4344891, No. 5:20-CV-184-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 23, 2021) LStar, which manages and sells development communities, sued defendants for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and false advertising under the Lanham Act, as well … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

USC IP year in review, TM/ROP

 My presentation, galloping across a bunch of developments. Slides here. Begin with legislative action: Trademark Modernization Act, Which introduces three of the big themes of the year: (1) trademark use, (2) the harm of infringement, and (3) the role of … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

maintaining outdated article on website about former supplier wasn’t false association

Archi’s Acres, Inc. v. Whole Foods Market Service, Inc., 2021 WL 424286, No. 19-CV-2478 JLS (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2021) Plaintiffs are farmers and growers of high-quality living organic basil. Whole Foods began purchasing small quantities of basil from … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

TM claimant may add false advertising claims as direct competitor

Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. Roach, 2021 WL 4134836, No. 8:20-cv-01690-JVS-AD (C.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2021) Entrepreneur, a frequent trademark claimant, sought to amend its complaint and add new parties to the TM claims here. Entrepreneur has 15 federal registrations that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

TM complainant fails to sink its teeth into unrelated false advertising claims

Vampire Family Brands, LLC v. MPL Brands, Inc., No. CV 20-9482-DMG (ASx), 2021 WL 4134841 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2021) VFB sued MPL for Lanham Act, UCL, and FAL violations based on MPL’s “vampiro” cocktail. Unsurprisingly, the trademark claims survive … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Video game skates away from liability to pro skateboarder

Miller v. Easy Day Studios Pty Ltd, 2021 WL 4209205, No. 20cv02187-LAB-DEB (S.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 2021) Gordon v. Drape did mess things up in the Ninth Circuit, but core Rogers cases are still simple. Defendants paid Zachary Miller, a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

over dissent, 5th Circuit applies Lanham Act to political speech

Alliance for Good Government v. Coalition for Better Government, No. 20-30233 (5th Cir. May 19, 2021) I sometimes hold out the hope that courts will develop a general treatment of the First Amendment/Lanham Act interaction. This case suggests that that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment