Tag Archives: trademark

court rejects Schedule A claims against sellers of compatible parts/accessories

Posted on August 19, 2025 by rtushnet

Bestway Inflatables & Material Corp. v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, 2025 WL 2380699, No. 24 C 11697 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 15, 2025) When they tell you that Schedule A cases … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

drug company plausibly alleged confusion about partnership but not falsity of “same drug” claims about Canadian imports

Posted on August 18, 2025 by rtushnet

AbbVie Inc. v. Payer Matrix, LLC, No. 23 CV 2836, 2025 WL 2374490 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 15, 2025) AbbVie sells the specialty drugs Humira, Skyrizi, and Rinvoq. Payer Matrix is “an alternative funding provider that works with self-funded health plans … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

New article: History and Tradition in First Amendment Intellectual Property Cases: A Critique

Posted on August 11, 2025 by rtushnet

 Preprint available here. Abstract There are indications that the “history and tradition” approach the Supreme Court applied to gun rights and abortion restrictions may be coming for First Amendment doctrine. In intellectual property cases, it already has, with the Court using historical … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: Closing plenary: DOGE; the First Amendment (me!); and the 50th anniversary of the Copyright Act

Posted on August 8, 2025 by rtushnet

David Schwartz (Northwestern Pritzker School of Law), Christopher Cotropia (The George Washington University Law School), DOGE Days at the USPTO? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Administrative Reform PTO provides some employees w/union protections and others not. As soon as … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: Comparative & International IP

Posted on August 8, 2025 by rtushnet

Karen Sandrik, Marquette University Law School, Cultural Legacies and Innovation Barriers: Comparative Lessons from Post–Soviet Research Institutions for American Innovation Policy Slovakia: Comenius U press release about first official patent sold/assigned by a Slovak university. They spent a year negotiating … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: Trademarks in Society

Posted on August 8, 2025 by rtushnet

Jonathan Masur, University of Chicago Law School, Measuring the Value of Trademark Distinctiveness: Evidence from the Market for Bordeaux Wines Branding is important; confusion is the core justification for TM to allow consumers to get what they want and firms … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

IPSC: Copyright Fair Use and User Rights/Trademark IV

Posted on August 8, 2025 by rtushnet

Copyright Fair Use and User Rights Stav Zeitouni, UC Berkeley School of Law, A Theory of Noncommerciality in Fair Use Lots of incoherent concepts—Hachette v. Internet Archive is example where dct used “failed to pay the customary price,” but ct … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: TM III/Music

Posted on August 7, 2025 by rtushnet

Trademark III Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Chicago–Kent College of Law – Illinois Institute of Technology, Not Just the Gutting of Rogers: A Window into Modern Trademark Challenges Defenses developed much more seriously in the US than in Europe. Rogers was an … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: TM II/(c) II

Posted on August 7, 2025 by rtushnet

Trademark II Mary Catherine Amerine, The George Washington University Law School, Mind the Gap: How Brand Gimmicks Have Made Infinite the Zone of Expansion Doritos x Empirical alcohol: on shelves for three years. Tesla mezcal. Le Moutarde Vin wine cobranded … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: TM I/(c) I

Posted on August 7, 2025 by rtushnet

IPSC, DePaul Trademark I Stacey Dogan, Boston University School of Law, Hollywood’s Trademark Law Courts seem to be treating classically expressive uses, including titles of movies, as source-indicating; Kagan didn’t seem to intend this result and courts should be more … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment