Tag Archives: trademark

IPSC session 1

Standard disclaimers apply: These are my summaries, not the presentations themselves. As usual, I have to skip a lot of interesting presentations and I try to attend things I haven’t seen, no matter how good the ones I have already … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Ninth Circuit don’t care: successful Rogers defense reversed because plaintiff’s trademark is “artistic”

Gordon v. Drape Creative, Inc., No. 16-56715 (9th Cir. Jul. 30, 2018) The Ninth Circuit routinely invents some new epicycle for trademark defenses; here it unfortunately mushes together Rogers and transformativeness (absent the word itself, replaced with “artistic”).  There are … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Plastic not so fantastic: video shot in medical facility didn’t defame or infringe facility’s TM rights

Weirton Medical Center, Inc. v. Introublezone, Inc., 2018 WL 3458261, J-A06003-18 (Pa. Super. Ct. Jul. 18, 2018) Dr. Craig Richard Oser was a plastic surgeon with staff privileges at plaintiff WMC from 2009 to 2014, making him an employee according … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

ASTM v. PublicResource.org: Trademark

American Society for Testing and Materials v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., No. 17-7035 (D.C. Cir. Jul. 17, 2018) Trademark: This was where the district court went very, very wrong—I consider the copyright issues difficult though I have a preferred outcome; the trademark … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

TM/False advertising issue of the day

Seen on the street in NYC; the candies have no marijuana content–they’re sold as “adult” candies, furthering the impression. My daughter also asked “Could the owners of Scooby Doo sue?” and then, because I have taught her well, corrected that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

False designation damages require proximate cause, dooming $250 million jury award

ZeniMax Media Inc. v. Oculus VR LLC, No. 14-cv-01849 (N.D. Tex. Jun. 27, 2018) After trial of this case, the jury returned a verdict, finding in relevant part that defendants were liable for false designation of origin, basically about the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

But in that sleep what dreams of liability may come?

When you sue a competitor for false advertising, be prepared to get sued back.  In this pair of opinions, most of the parties’ claims against each other survived, paving the way for a messy trial. GhostBed, Inc. v. Casper Sleep, Inc., … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

TM exam question: the right of publicity v. comparative advertising

What if Coco Chanel had been the plaintiff in Smith v. Chanel?  This question made me very happy, and I got a bunch of interesting answers on my final: Kim Kardashian is famous for being famous. She is a highly … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

ABC doesn’t find getting rid of pro se (c) and TM claim so simple

 Manigault v. ABC Inc., 2018 WL 2022823, No. 17-CV-7375 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 12, 2018) (magistrate judge) An app owner’s copyright and trademark claims against a news organization for broadcasting a news story about apps, including his, survive a motion to dismiss … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Alzheimer’s Association and Alzheimer’s Foundation in keyword battle

Among other things, this case has some interesting things to say about IIC and proper controls in survey cases. Alzheimer’s Disease & Related Disorders Association, Inc. v. Alzheimer’s Foundation of America, Inc. 2018 WL 1918618, No. 10-CV-3314 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 20, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment