-
Recent Posts
- trademark law firm loses trademark lawsuit
- license agreement termination might be invalid transfer in gross without a new partner for licensor
- Reading list and comments: Doctrine, Data, and the Death of DuPont
- reasonable consumers read promotion terms on a gambling app, court rules
- Third Circuit affirms disgorgement award in “Made in the USA” case
Recent Comments
Archives
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Monthly Archives: March 2016
Alleged Amazon shenanigans constitute use in commerce and commercial advertising/promotion
Jae Enterprises, Inc. v. OxGord Inc., 2016 WL 865328, No. 15-CV-228 (W.D. Ky. Mar. 2, 2016) Jae sells aftermarket automobile accessories under the mark Eagle Flight and designs. Jae entered into a distribution agreement with defendants, who resold the … Continue reading
My forthcoming article on 2(a) and the First Amendment
Rebecca Tushnet, The First Amendment Walks into a Bar: Trademark Registration and Free Speech, Notre Dame Law Review (forthcoming) This Essay analyzes the First Amendment arguments against §2(a)’s disparagement bar with reference to the consequences of any invalidation on the … Continue reading
Buddy, can you spare a TRO? No injunction for overlapping use of “big” and “hunting”
Enerco Group, Inc. v. Deutsch, No. 16CV213, 2016 WL 852572 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 3, 2016) Enerco sued Deutsch for false advertising and trademark infringement. Enerco makes portable propane heaters called “Buddy Heaters,” used by outdoorsmen and fishermen in enclosures … Continue reading
Nook shuts down in UK; another reason to hate DRM
But UK customers might get to keep access to certain books they “bought,” if all goes well. As usual, xkcd had it right years ago. from Blogger http://ift.tt/21XgGao
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged dmca, drm, Nook shuts down in UK; another reason to hate DRM 1201
Leave a comment
Copyright Office notice of inquiry on 1201
Comments I’ve seen so far: Organization for Transformative Works comment (of which I am very proud!) Public Knowledge New America’s Open Technology Institute New Media Rights Joint Libertarian Comments (R Street, FreedomWorks, and Niskanen Institute) International Documentary Association Consumers Union … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, Copyright Office notice of inquiry on 1201 1201, dmca, fanworks, my writings
Leave a comment
Anonymous defamatory posts are “advertising or promotion” under Lanham Act
Romeo & Juliette Laser Hair Removal, Inc. v. Assara I LLC, 2016 WL 815205, No. 8-cv-0442 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 29, 2016) R&J sued Assara and a number of related people eight years ago. The parties compete to offer laser hair … Continue reading
Land o’ (non)confusion: no dilution or reverse confusion with dissimilar goods
Hugunin v. Land O’ Lakes, Inc., No. 15-2815 (7th Cir. Mar. 1, 2016) This opinion reflects what you might call Judge Posner’s trademark mix of good sense and arrogance/lack of reasons enabling one to formulate an actual rule for … Continue reading
Trademark defendant wins rare unclean hands defense to injunction
Cochran Firm, P.C. v. Cochran Firm Los Angeles LLP, — Fed.Appx. —, 2016 WL 770129, No. 15–55816 (9th Cir. Feb. 29, 2016) A rare unclean hands win for a trademark defendant! The Cochran Firm appealed the district court’s order … Continue reading
Fraud claim by NY AG against Donald Trump revived on appeal
People ex rel. Schneiderman v. Trump Entrepreneur Initiative LLC, — N.Y.S.3d —-, 2016 WL 783216, 2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 01430 (Sup. Ct. Mar. 1, 2016) Snarky political note: It doesn’t appear that Trump could object to this ruling on … Continue reading
Initial comments on 1201: fixing what’s broken
I’ve been reading through the initial comments on 1201 for the Copyright Office’s inquiry. One overarching thought: current “winners”—successful exemption proponents—unanimously say the current process is broken. Current losers—unsuccessful exemption opponents—occasionally express openness to minor tweaks, such as a meaningless … Continue reading →