-
Recent Posts
- trademark law firm loses trademark lawsuit
- license agreement termination might be invalid transfer in gross without a new partner for licensor
- Reading list and comments: Doctrine, Data, and the Death of DuPont
- reasonable consumers read promotion terms on a gambling app, court rules
- Third Circuit affirms disgorgement award in “Made in the USA” case
Recent Comments
Archives
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Monthly Archives: August 2016
IPSC: Closing Plenary Session
The Nature of Sequential Innovation Christopher Sprigman, Christopher Buccafusco & Stefan Bechtold How to pick between innovating or borrowing. “Cinderella Man” is harder to develop than another movie about Rocky. Risky, as is question about whether to develop another erectile … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, IPSC: Closing Plenary Session conferences, patent, presentations, trademark
Leave a comment
IPSC Breakout Session IV
Empirical Copyright Copyright Misuse: A Taxonomy Ann Bartow Occasionally called copyright misuse; non-US countries call it something else, but trying to taxonomize a certain type of misbehavior. Some of this is not currently called misuse: using © to try to … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, IPSC Breakout Session IV conferences, patent
Leave a comment
IPSC Breakout Session III
IP & Privacy Exploring Privacy as Commons Katherine Strandburg & Brett Frischmann Knowledge production/privacy as highly related, not orthogonal/opposed. Knowledge production framework as a way of doing descriptive empirical case studies of how privacy works in context, which can aid … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged dmca, first amendment, IPSC Breakout Session III conferences, privacy, trademark
Leave a comment
IPSC breakout session 2
IPSC Breakout Session II: Trademarks, Advertising & Consumers Relying on Reputation Jim Gibson Reputation: what rational consumers would use to decide what products/services to buy. We shouldn’t expect that info to be widely available to consumers w/o some help, and … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged conferences, dilution, IPSC breakout session 2 advertising, trademark
Leave a comment
IPSC Breakout Session I
IPSC Breakout Session I: Copyright: Music & Remixes Assessing France’s Graduated Response Scheme Against Piracy & State Interventionism in the Marketplace for Copyrighted Content Nicholas Jondet Strong philosophical attachment to ©, and economic interests—Universal Music is French-owned. In practice, low … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, IPSC Breakout Session I conferences, music
Leave a comment
IPSC First Plenary Session
Scarcity of Attention in a World without IP Jake Linford We impose artificial scarcity so authors can pick up sunk costs. But costs of creation have fallen; perhaps © should be narrowed as a result. Wrinkle: attention scarcity. Cheaper dissemination … Continue reading
failure to speak can be advertising but not presentations to trainers
WIKA Instrument I, LP v. Ashcroft, Inc., 2015 WL 11199059, No. 13-CV-43 (N.D. Ga. Jul. 10, 2016) WIKA sued Ashcroft, a competing maker of pressure gauges, for false advertising and related claims, and Ashcroft counterclaimed similarly. WIKA sells the XSEL … Continue reading
Confusion bans are content-based so disclaimers must be tried first, court rules
Pursuing America’s Greatness v. Federal Election Comm’n, No. 15-5264 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 2, 2016) I wonder whether INTA is worried about this case. If not, why not? The Federal Election Commission prohibits unauthorized political committees, like Pursuing America’s Greatness, from … Continue reading
Confusion bans are content-based so disclaimers must be tried first, court rules
Pursuing America’s Greatness v. Federal Election Comm’n, No. 15-5264 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 2, 2016) I wonder whether INTA is worried about this case. If not, why not? The Federal Election Commission prohibits unauthorized political committees, like Pursuing America’s Greatness, from … Continue reading
Strict liability means competitor can create literal falsity by bringing out better product
SharkNinja Operating LLC v. Dyson Inc., No. 14-cv-13720 (D. Mass. Aug. 3, 2016) In 2013, Dyson launched an ad campaign claiming that some of its vacuums had “twice the suction of any other vacuum” on the market. In July 2014, … Continue reading