Monthly Archives: June 2024

bad influence: claims against vodka producer proceed, including failure to disclose endorser payments

Sava v. 21st Century Spirits, LLC, 2024 WL 3161625, No. 22 C 6083 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 25, 2024) 21st Century sells Blue Ice Vodka and uses influencers to promote it. Plaintiffs brought claims under the state consumer protection statutes of … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Initial thoughts on Elster

In part so as not to repudiate big chunks of Tam/Brunetti, the Court instead delivers a major rebuke to Reed v. Town of Gilbert, 576 U.S. 155 (2015) (content-based regulation triggers strict scrutiny), except it doesn’t tell us the scope … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Is a free trial version “commercial speech”?

Enigma Software Gp. USA LLC v. Malwarebytes Inc., 2024 WL 2883671, No. 17-cv-02915-EJD (N.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2024) This is the latest decision in long-running litigation over Malwarebytes’ characterization of Enigma’s competing cybersecurity and anti-malware software as “malicious,” a “threat,” … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

where ingredients list can’t clarify ambiguity, “manage blood sugar” claim is plausibly misleading

Prescott v. Abbott Laboratories, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2024 WL 2843092, No. 23-cv-04348-PCP (N.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2024) Abbott Laboratories’s Glucerna line of powders and shakes are marketed as scientifically designed for people with diabetes to help manage blood sugar. Plaintiffs … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“#1 Brand” claim was literally false because of apples-to-oranges comparison

Zesty Paws LLC v. Nutramax Labs., Inc., No. 23 Civ. 10849 (LGS), 2024 WL 2853622 (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 4, 2024) Finding Zesty Paws’ “#1 Brand” claim literally false, the court grants a preliminary injunction despite Zesty Paws’ attempt to create a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Another challenge to “up to 8 hours of relief” proceeds

Sheiner v. Supervalu Inc., 2024 WL 2803030, No. 22 Civ. 10262 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. May 28, 2024) Supervalu sold a “Maximum Strength Lidocaine Patch” product which contained “topical anesthetic 4% Lidocaine” which “desensitize[s] aggravated nerves” to provide “temporary relief of pain” … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Second Circuit affirms rejection of “All Natural” survey as too leading

Bustamante v. KIND, LLC, 100 F.4th 419 (2d Cir. 2024) The court of appeals affirmed summary judgment in favor of KIND on Bustamante’s false advertising consumer protection class action claims based on KIND’s “All Natural” labeling. The complaint alleged that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment