Monthly Archives: February 2026

Deadly automatic litterbox might be falsely advertised as “safe”

Gomez v. PetPivot, Inc., 2026 WL 507708, No. 25-cv-5622 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2026) “Safe” is the kind of word that is general enough that it might be puffery, but courts think that safety is important enough that they sometimes … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Amicus in support of cert in Lanham Act intent/damages case

 Truth in Advertising, Barton Beebe, Mark Lemley, Alexandra Roberts and I just filed a brief arguing that the Supreme Court should clarify the role of intent in Lanham Act cases. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2026/02/amicus-in-support-of-cert-in-lanham-act.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Does “Dead Weeds in 1 Day” mean the entire weed will die, or just the visible part?

Scotts Co. v. Procter & Gamble Co., 2026 WL 482655, No. 2:24-cv-4199 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 20, 2026) Previously, the court rejected Scotts’ request for a preliminary injunction of the trade dress of P&G’s Spruce brand of weed killer products, finding … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

(c) licensor’s claims about competitor’s allegedly worse licenses were opinion, not falsifiable fact

Tresóna Multimedia, LLC v. Pre-Cleared Ltd. D/B/A ClicknClear, 2026 WL 480858, No. 25-cv-6202 (GBD) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 19, 2026) Tresóna, a music copyright licensing entity, sued competitor ClicknClear for NY state and federal false advertising. The court dismissed the claim. Since … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Fairlife brand name plausibly misleading where cows allegedly lived abuse-filled lives of suffering

Bhotiwihok v. Fairlife, LLC, № 2:25-cv-01650-ODW (AGRx), 2026 WL 413749 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2026) “In 2014, Select Milk, a dairy cooperative, partnered with Coca-Cola to launch Fairlife, a company with an eponymous line of premium milk and milk products…. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

disgorgement can’t be a lottery windfall–even when D was engaged in illegal gambling

TNT Amusements, Inc. v. Torch Electronics, LLC, 2026 WL 411747, No. 4:23-CV-330-JAR (E.D. Mo. Feb. 13, 2025) Previously. TNT leases traditional arcade games in retail locations throughout Missouri. Torch Electronics leases “no-chance” gaming devices in the same market. A jury … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

CFP: emerging First Amendment scholars

Second Annual Aspiring Free Speech Scholars Workshopjointly sponsored by the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law (ASU)and the Hoover Institution (Stanford University) Are you a law student, judicial law clerk, lawyer, or beginning academic hoping to publish a journal article … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“ambiguity” is taking hold in consumer protection class actions, but it’s not the Lanham Act concept

Ramirez v. S. Martinelli & Co., 2026 WL 272621, No. 25-cv-07569-NC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2026) Martinelli’s apple juice products’ front labels state either “Premium 100% Juice Not From Concentrate” or “100% Juice From U.S. Grown Fresh Apples.” The products … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

conducting dueling internet searches converts attys into fact witnesses in TM case

Vicious Brands, Inc. v. Face Co., No. 24-cv-04996-LJC, 2026 WL 276178 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2026) (magistrate) Plaintiff, aka Saints & Sinners, sued Face, aka Skin Saint, alleging trademark infringement and false advertising. The court granted the motion to dismiss … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment