Author Archives: rtushnet

ThermoLife continues mixed record in pleading competitive injury from other supplements

ThermoLife International LLC v. Compound Solutions Inc., No. CV-19-01473-PHX-SMM, 2019 WL 5448804 (D. Ariz. Jul. 30, 2019) ThermoLife develops “amino acid nitrates used in dietary supplements to increase vasodilation,” and alleged that vasodilators are “included in nearly every pre-workout product … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

DuraBlend leather-ish label not misleading

Razo v. Ashley Furniture Indus., Inc., No. 17-56770, 2019 WL 5543849, — Fed.Appx. —- (9th Cir. Oct. 28, 2019) Ashley preserved its summary judgment win in this putative class action asserting the usual California claims against furniture with leather-ish components. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

implied claims of FDA approval actionable under Lanham Act

Kurin, Inc. v. Magnolia Medical Technologies, Inc., 2019 WL 5422931, No.: 3:18-cv-1060-L-LL (S.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2019) Kurin developed the Kurin Lock, a “specimen diversion device that reduces the risk of blood culture contamination and associated false positive blood culture … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

it’s hard to frame the right cause of action for Amazon seller-on-seller misbehavior

Factory Direct Wholesale, LLC v. iTouchless Housewares & Products, Inc., 2019 WL 5423450, No. 19-CV-01228-LHK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2019) The parties compete to sell stuff on Amazon. They agreed to the Amazon Seller Agreement, which requires the seller to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Creating a Facebook page for a rival and leaving fake reviews for them is a bad idea

We often tell students that one risk of bringing a false advertising claim, as a competitor, is that there might be counterclaims if you don’t have your own house in order. Here, the plaintiff fails to give enough specifics of … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

law firm blog about somebody else’s case isn’t commercial speech

Wexler v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2019 WL 5485265, No. 18-CV-3066-SJB (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2019) Eric Goldman’s coverage. Wexler, a lawyer proceeding pro se, sued Dorsey (a law firm that does defendant-side Telephone & Consumer Protection Act … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Heart of darkness: hedonic regression damages model allows certification in flushable wipes case

Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2019 WL 5483510, Nos. 14-CV-1142, 14-CV-4090 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2019) Here, the consumer class action concerns allegedly false advertising of “flushable” wipes that have generated municipal lawsuits around the country. After remand to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

company claiming rights in “overhead doors” makes little headway against challenger

OGD Equipment Co. v. Overhead Door Corp., No. 17-cv-00898-ALM-KPJ, 2019 WL 5390589 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 15, 2019) This is the magistrate judge’s R&R, subsequently adopted by the court. OGD is a Texas “residential and commercial door repair and installation company” … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

TM/ad text question of the day

The shorthand rule in the US is that if you don’t use the competitor’s trademark in your ad text, you’re fine. What if you do? The below ad (which you get by searching “broken Garmin mounts”) isn’t an explicit statement, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

TRO against insurer to provide information during open enrollment

PeaceHealth v. Health Net Health Plan, Inc., 2019 WL 5386474, No. 6:19-cv-01648-MK (D. Ore. Oct. 21, 2019) Here, the court worries about granting a TRO as compelled speech even though the speech is quintessentially commercial and the need to protect … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment