Author Archives: rtushnet

IPSC Breakout Session #3: Distributive Effects/Art and Music

Bita Amani, Some More Equal Than Others: Critical Contexts for the (False) Promises of Intellectual Property Rights        IP and sustainable development goals: What is equality itself? Often formal equality is presented in the pretext of equal application … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Breakout Session #2: mostly copyright and then marijuana innovation

Michael Carroll (w/ Peter Jaszi), Fair Use After Google and Warhol Codification is a big deal; clarifies that fair use is a distinct doctrine, whereas well into 20th century courts were using it as noninfringement. Courts weren’t using four factors … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Breakout Session #1

Too much to choose from; I prioritized things that were new to me. Mark Bartholomew, A Right to Be Left Dead If we can create new works in a dead author’s style after they’re gone and create conversations with them … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Opening Plenary Session

 Matthew Sag, Copyright Safety for Generative AI Not addressing whether training is always fair use in every circumstance; explain how generative AI fits w/in existing law (nonexpressive uses) and identify best practices to make generative AI fairer. Non expressive uses: … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

poop bag seller’s “compostable” claims are plausibly … false

Natale v. 9199-4467 Quebec Inc., 2023 WL 4850531, No. 21-CV-6775 (JS)(SIL) (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2023) Many lawsuits against “recyclable” claims have been dismissed, but not this “compostable” one. Defendant sells “Earth Rated Certified Compostable Poop Bags.” “On the packaging [of] … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

allowing free “For Sale By Owner” ads doesn’t imply no agents will be involved

Picket Fence Preview, Inc. v. Zillow, Inc., 2023 WL 4852971, No. 22-2066-cv (2d Cir. Jul. 31, 2023) District court opinion discussed (second) here.  The district court dismissed Picket Fence’s false advertising/unfair competition claims against Zillow under the Vermont Consumer Protection … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

WaPo on gold advertising and right-wing media

 I’m quoted in the story. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2023/07/wapo-on-gold-advertising-and-right-wing.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Defendant’s belief its ads were effective is evidence of injury

Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., 2023 WL 4681569, No. 2:22-cv-05326-RGK-MARx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2023) Sandoz brought state and federal false advertising claims against Amgen for its advertising of Neulasta, a pegfilgrastim injection used to treat the immunity-reducing side effects … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Former distributor’s continuing use of “authorized distributor” leads to TM and false advertising claims

Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Luxury Home Buyers, LLC, No. 2:20-cv-01344-JAD-VCF, |2023 WL 4636917 (D. Nev. Jul. 19, 2023) In what seems likely a missed opportunity due to insufficient investment in the defense, the court grants summary judgment against an argument … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

over aggressive partial dissent, 11th Cir. allows some class claims against Ford “track ready” claims to proceed

Tershakovec v. Ford Motor Company, Inc., — F.4th —-, 2023 WL 4377585, No. 22-10575 (11th Cir. Jul. 7, 2023) Discussion of district court opinion. Ford advertised its Shelby GT350 Mustang as “track ready.” “But some Shelby models weren’t equipped for … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment