Category Archives: Uncategorized

Heart of darkness: hedonic regression damages model allows certification in flushable wipes case

Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2019 WL 5483510, Nos. 14-CV-1142, 14-CV-4090 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2019) Here, the consumer class action concerns allegedly false advertising of “flushable” wipes that have generated municipal lawsuits around the country. After remand to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

company claiming rights in “overhead doors” makes little headway against challenger

OGD Equipment Co. v. Overhead Door Corp., No. 17-cv-00898-ALM-KPJ, 2019 WL 5390589 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 15, 2019) This is the magistrate judge’s R&R, subsequently adopted by the court. OGD is a Texas “residential and commercial door repair and installation company” … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

TM/ad text question of the day

The shorthand rule in the US is that if you don’t use the competitor’s trademark in your ad text, you’re fine. What if you do? The below ad (which you get by searching “broken Garmin mounts”) isn’t an explicit statement, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

TRO against insurer to provide information during open enrollment

PeaceHealth v. Health Net Health Plan, Inc., 2019 WL 5386474, No. 6:19-cv-01648-MK (D. Ore. Oct. 21, 2019) Here, the court worries about granting a TRO as compelled speech even though the speech is quintessentially commercial and the need to protect … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

putative falsity about medical test not material to labs, but maybe to doctors

Quidel Corp. v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., No. 16-cv-3059-BAS-AGS, 2019 WL 5320390 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2019) A pair of opinions shows the importance of (1) defining the market and (2) being able to show materiality. The parties compete … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Amicus in Dr. Seuss v. ComicMix

Here. With Mark Lemley, Jessica Litman, Lydia Loren, Pam Samuelson, and Erik Stallman.  from Blogger https://ift.tt/2OMxfrJ

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

incentivized reviews/targeted upvoting can be false advertising, court reiterates

Vitamins Online, Inc. v. HeartWise, Inc., No. 13-CV-982 (D. Utah Sept. 24, 2019) Supplement industry behavior is wild.   Vitamins Online sells dietary supplements online, including on Amazon, using the name NutriGold. HeartWise, aka NatureWise, competes with NutriGold, including on Amazon, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

incentivized reviews/targeted upvoting can be false advertising, court reiterates

Vitamins Online, Inc. v. HeartWise, Inc., No. 13-CV-982 (D. Utah Sept. 24, 2019) Supplement industry behavior is wild.   Vitamins Online sells dietary supplements online, including on Amazon, using the name NutriGold. HeartWise, aka NatureWise, competes with NutriGold, including on Amazon, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

ingredient supplier has standing against disparagement of products/false claims about competing product

ThermoLife Int’l LLC v. Vital Pharms. Inc., No. 19-cv-61380-BLOOM/Valle, 2019 WL 4954622 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 8, 2019) ThermoLife licenses/sells a patented creatine nitrate used in dietary supplements, which is allegedly included in many top-selling dietary supplements. VPX allegedly attacked ThermoLife’s … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

medical influencers show up in false advertising case

Wright Medical Technology, Inc. v. Paragon 28, Inc., 2019 WL 4751807,  No. 18-cv-00691-PAB-STV (D. Colo. Sept. 30, 2019) Wright is a medical device developer, manufacturer, and distributor; its products include surgical plates and other instruments used to repair bones in … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment