Category Archives: Uncategorized

occasional door-to-door false claims covered by state, but not federal, false advertising law

Vivint, Inc. v. Northstar Alarm Services, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, 2019 WL 1098986, No. 16-cv-00106-JNP-EJF (D. Utah Mar. 8, 2019) The parties compete in the market for electronic home automation and security systems. They market themselves in various … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Compounder’s claims of FDA approval/legality were literally false and material

Allergan USA, Inc. v. Prescribers Choice, Inc., No. 17-cv-01550-DOC-JDE, 2019 WL 650424 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2019) Allergan “markets a portfolio of leading medical brands and products.” Prescriber’s Choice and Sincerus have common ownership and work together: “Sincerus produces drugs; … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

supplement guide isn’t “advertising or promotion” under the Lanham Act, even w/undisclosed affiliation

Ariix, LLC v. NutriSearch Corp., 2019 WL 1040135, No. 17CV320-LAB (BGS) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2019) Previous iteration discussed here. Arrix competes fiercely with Usana in the nutritional supplement market.  NutriSearch publishes the NutriSearch Comparative Guide to Nutritional Supplements, a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

plaintiff suing for noncomparative false advertising fails to establish irreparable harm

True Organic Products, Inc. v. California Organic Fertilizers, Inc., 2019 WL 1023888, No. 18-CV-1278 AWI EG (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2019) If trademark owners have cause to bemoan eBay’s application to Lanham Act claims, false advertising plaintiffs have even more, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

sales show format and timing are functional, court finds

VBS Distribution, Inc. v. Nutrivita Laboratories, Inc., No. SACV 16-01553-CJC(DFM), 2018 WL 5274172 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 10, 2018) The parties compete in the market for nutritional supplements and television programs. VBS sued for Lanham Act and California state unfair competition … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

False advertising & TM fail as workarounds to 230 for software blocking

PC Drivers Headquarters, LP v. Malwarebytes Inc., 2019 WL 1061739, No. 18-cv-05409-EJD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2019) PC Drivers alleged that Malwarebytes’ malware detection software wrongfully categorized PC Drivers’ “technical support” software as malware or a “Potentially Unwanted Program” (PUP), … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

“local” is falsifiable but relative, meaning damages for false advertising must be limited

Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. Sycamore, 2019 WL 1058234, No. 13-cv-00749 (D. Utah Mar. 5, 2019) Previously, Bimbo won a false advertising claim in front of a jury against U.S. Bakery for trade secret misappropriation and for falsely advertising its … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

It wasn’t malpractice to argue unauthorized use of name was false association, not false advertising

Majorsky v. Lieber, No. 798 WDA 2017, 2019 WL 1092543 (Pa. Super. Ct. Mar. 8, 2019) Majorsky and two business partners, Douglas and Natale, purchased the D.J. Hess Advertising Company. “D.J. Hess is a partnership that sells promotional products, items … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

copying without infringement, falsity without materiality in adhesive case

J-B Weld Co., LLC v. Gorilla Glue Co., 2018 WL 6356768, No. 17-CV-03946-LMM (N.D. Ga. Oct. 17, 2018) Among other things, this case is a reminder that when you sue a competitor for false advertising you can often expect counterclaims–here … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Omission of side effects in lash “cosmetic” ads was plausibly false & misleading

Lewis v. Rodan & Fields, LLC, 2019 WL 978768, No. 18-cv-02248-PJH (N.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2019) Nine plaintiffs brought a putative class action alleging that defendant Rodan failed to disclose that its Enhancement Lash Boost eye serum, advertised as a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment