-
Recent Posts
- State barber board wins battle against “Barber Shop” bar
- compounding pharmacies lose a round with Lilly on personalized medicine and GLP-1 comparison claims
- Bayer can’t enjoin J&J’s cancer superiority claims by showing methodological disputes
- “higher standard of safety” is puffery even as to child car seats
- phthalates could be “ingredient” for purposes of falsifying “only natural ingredients”
Recent Comments
Archives
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Stanford Sociology & Psychology of IP, branding
Session 4: The sociology and psychology of brands Discussion leaders: Jeanne Fromer: A lot of work in this area. Some is about how consumers react to branding in systematic ways. Rule of thumb in talking to branding folks: if you … Continue reading
Sociology and Psychology of IP, Session 3: What can we learn from IP-free zones?
Discussion leaders: Kate Darling: attribution as something that people want rather than money in “negative spaces.” They know they can monetize their reputations. Systems of self-governance often differ from those of formal law. Attribution preference is not just about fairness/ego. … Continue reading
Sociology and Psychology of IP, Session 3: What can we learn from IP-free zones?
Discussion leaders: Kate Darling: attribution as something that people want rather than money in “negative spaces.” They know they can monetize their reputations. Systems of self-governance often differ from those of formal law. Attribution preference is not just about fairness/ego. … Continue reading
The Psychology and Sociology of IP, patents
Session 2: Why do companies patent? Discussion leaders: Lisa Ouellette: Accounts indicate that non-incentive reasons drive much patenting, contrary to standard incentive story. What do sociologists etc. think about this divide in accounts? Sociology/psychology give us tools when economic rationality … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged design patent, patent, patents conferences, The Psychology and Sociology of IP
Leave a comment
The Psychology and Sociology of Creativity and IP, Stanford Law School
Session 1: Why do people create? Discussion leaders: Jessica Silbey Why and how? Psychological perspective, individual: b/c it’s fun, play; problem-solving; creativity as essential to who they are/identity-forming; as natural. Literature on extrinsic v. intrinsic motivation. Different ways of operationalizing … Continue reading
“same active ingredient” claim is false when P’s product has multiple active ingredients
Merial LLC v. Fidopharm, Inc., 2014 WL 11930586, No. 13-cv-1207 (N.D. Ga. Sept. 5, 2014) Old, but interesting enough to blog when it showed up in my Westclip search. Merial sells Frontline, a popular line of flea and tick preventives. … Continue reading
NY law offers more than 43(a) when it comes to allegedly misleading omissions
Casper Sleep, Inc. v. Mitcham, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2016 WL 4574388, 16 Civ. 3224 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 1, 2016 Casper sells mattresses over the internet, while Mitcham and Mattress Nerd LLC operate a website that reviews mattresses. Casper sued under § … Continue reading
If a body catch a body in high heels
Transformative work of the day? These “Catcher in the Rye” heels involve both decoupage and paint (for some of the quotes). What should the copyright/TM analysis look like? from Blogger http://ift.tt/2cwfMRX
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged If a body catch a body in high heels copyright, trademark
Leave a comment
More Canadian IP pictures
Not legal in the US: Cafe Olimpico, since 1970 Fake store with NY Yankees logo variant Iraq-a-Fella records OK, not gonna lie, I’m interested in the use of the Rubik’s cube to indicate the completeness of the game plan advertised, … Continue reading
both sides do it: court in Trump Univ. case resolves some expert squabbles
Cohen v. Trump, No.: 3:13-cv-2519, 2016 WL 4487172 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2016) Colorful personalities can produce colorful cases; first, Pom Wonderful, now Trump. The court certified a class action under RICO for people who bought Trump University real estate … Continue reading