-
Recent Posts
- court finds “dupe” label probative of intent to confuse and likely confusion
- materiality divides false advertising and TM once again even with explicit falsity about official partnership
- Google’s alleged misrepresentations about sophisticated ad tech weren’t “consumer-oriented” under NY GBL
- consumer suit against kratom seller proceeds on failure to disclose theory
- Court sours on WSI’s claims against Quince
Recent Comments
Archives
- October 2026
- September 2026
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Campbell conference: Justin Hughes keynote
Closing Keynote Address: Justin Hughes In a world of complex laws, like tax regulation, everyone likes the idea of a rule that’s both general and exculpatory—fun and safe because when you’re applying a multifactor test it’s very difficult to … Continue reading
Campbell conference: future of digital tech
Panel IV. Campbell and the Future of Digital Technologies (Moderator, Dean O’Connor) O’Connor: output of one creative person becomes input for the next. Consider how copyright and fair use work in that system. Robert Brauneis, George Washington University: … Continue reading
Campbell conference: Judge Leval keynote
Keynote Address: The Honorable Pierre Leval Earned a reversal rate of 67% in his significant fair use cases; at the cutting edge of law in the role of the salami. Campbell: good framework for authors, without manacles on science. … Continue reading
Campbell conference: ethical and strategic issues in fair use litigation
Panel III. Ethical and Strategic Issues in Fair Use Litigation (Moderator, Professor Naeve) Naeve: discuss ethics of parody, disparagement, use in pornographic work. Should you ask permission? Lydia Loren, Lewis & Clark: for all its positive effects, she … Continue reading
Campbell conference: transformative use across the arts
Panel II. Transformative Use Across The Arts (Moderator, Professor Said) Annemarie Bridy, Idaho: Role of aesthetic judgments in fair use cases. Bleistein principle of aesthetic neutrality/nondiscrimination. Campbell said it wouldn’t judge whether the parody was good, just whether it … Continue reading
Campbell conference: overview on fair use
Panel I. Overview of Fair Use Since Campbell (Moderator, Professor Gomulkiewicz) Barton Beebe, NYU Updated dataset 1978-2014: 460 opinions. Available on his website. Significant limitations of case-counting: can’t substitute for qualitative analysis or other quantitative approaches looking at … Continue reading
Pam Samuelson on futures of fair use
University of Washington School of Law: Fair Use In The Digital Age: The Ongoing Influence of Campbell v. Acuff-Rose’s “Transformative Use Test” (aka Campbell at 21) Opening Keynote Address: Professor Pam Samuelson: Possible Futures of Fair Use Campbell … Continue reading
Thermolife sues critic’s blog for cybersquatting
A reader pointed me to this lawsuit, alleging cybersquatting against http://ift.tt/1CLQWzE based on Thermolife’s Muscle Beach marks. You may notice that this isn’t really a domain name, but a blog hosted on WordPress. In an in rem proceeding, will the court … Continue reading
resources spent correcting false advertising provide business standing in California
Underground Solutions, Inc. v. Palermo, No. 13 C 8407, 2015 WL 1594189 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 7, 2015) Previous ruling on this dispute between Underground Solutions and a person who basically served as an expert supporting its competitor. Related case … Continue reading
Preemption and dormant commerce clause challenges to Cal. Made in US law fail
Clark v. Citizens of Humanity, LLC, No. 14–CV–1404, 2015 WL 1600679 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2015) Plaintiffs bought Citizens of Humanity jeans marked with “Made in the USA,” but alleged that the products contained component parts made outside the … Continue reading