-
Recent Posts
- license agreement termination might be invalid transfer in gross without a new partner for licensor
- Reading list and comments: Doctrine, Data, and the Death of DuPont
- reasonable consumers read promotion terms on a gambling app, court rules
- Third Circuit affirms disgorgement award in “Made in the USA” case
- despite rejecting Lanham Act PI, court enjoins D from making negative statements about P in public if prospective customers might see
Recent Comments
Archives
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: commercial speech
thorough opinion allows CT’s greenwashing claims against Exxon to proceed
State v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 2025 WL 3459468, No. HHDCV206132568S (Conn. Super. Ct. Nov. 26, 2025) The court allows greenwashing claims against Exxon to proceed under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA). The state alleged a decades-long “systematic campaign … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged commercial speech, consumer protection, false advertising, first amendment
Leave a comment
“abortion pill reversal” proponents engaged in noncommercial speech, 2d Circuit agrees for PI purposes
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. James, — F.4th —-, 2025 WL 3439256, No. 24-2481-cv (2d Cir. Dec. 1, 2025) Unlike the similar California proceeding, the district court in NY granted a preliminary injunction against enforcement of consumer … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged commercial speech, consumer protection, false advertising, first amendment
Leave a comment
California’s limits on use of “doctor” in healthcare settings are constitutional regulations of commercial speech
Palmer v. Bonta, 2025 WL 2882948, No. EDCV 23-1047 JGB (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Sept. 19, 2025) Plaintiffs alleged that California Business and Professions Code § 2054(a), on its face and as enforced, violates the First Amendment because it provides, in … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged commercial speech, false advertising, first amendment
Leave a comment
“abortion reversal” promoter engaged in inherently and potentially misleading commercial speech, court rules
Culture of Life Family Services, Inc. v. Bonta, 2025 WL 1677783, No. 3:24-cv-01338-GPC-KSC (S.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2025) In two opinions on the same day, the court didn’t give much comfort to an “abortion reversal” provider. COLFS sought to enjoin … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged commercial speech, false advertising, first amendment
Leave a comment
nonprofits’ promotion of “abortion reversal” services was commercial speech
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Bonta, No. 2:24-CV-08468-HDV-(MARx), 2025 WL 1140450 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2025) Not sure this one survives appellate review, but we’ll see. NIFLA sued for injunctive relief against California AG Bonta over his … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged commercial speech, false advertising, first amendment
Leave a comment
J&J’s talc subsidiary can bring trade libel but not Lanham Act claims against testifying experts
LLT Management LLC v. Emory, No. 4:24-cv-75, 2025 WL 438100 (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2025) The defendants “published an article in a scientific journal, asserting that they had identified 75 people, additional to 33 in an earlier study, who had … Continue reading
are certificates of analysis and other technical specs commercial speech?
Sweegen, Inc. v. Manus Bio Inc., No. 8:24-cv-01757-JVS-DFM, 2024 WL 5317280 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2024) Sweegen is one of the largest suppliers of non-GMO Rebaudioside M or “Reb M” sweetener, manufactured through bioconversion from stevia leaves. Its competitor makes … Continue reading
coordinated campaign to disparage grain-free & other pet food not actionable under Lanham Act
Ketonatural Pet Foods, Inc. v. Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc., 2024 WL 4679219, No. 24-2046-KHV (D. Kan. Nov. 4, 2024) Ketonatural is a start-up that sells grain-free pet food, treats, and supplements. Hill’s is a large pet food company that makes … Continue reading
lawsuit against plaintiffs’ expert witness fails on First Amendment grounds
LTL Mgmt. LLC v. Moline, 2024 WL 3219683, No. 23-02990 (GC) (JTQ) (D.N.J. Jun. 28, 2024) Not currently in bankruptcy, LTL—J&J’s solution to its talc woes—decided to sue a critic for her scientific conclusions about talc risks. The court dismisses … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged commercial speech, defamation, false advertising, first amendment
Leave a comment
Is a free trial version “commercial speech”?
Enigma Software Gp. USA LLC v. Malwarebytes Inc., 2024 WL 2883671, No. 17-cv-02915-EJD (N.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2024) This is the latest decision in long-running litigation over Malwarebytes’ characterization of Enigma’s competing cybersecurity and anti-malware software as “malicious,” a “threat,” … Continue reading