Tag Archives: conferences

Conference: administrative law/private law interface in IP

Posted on February 26, 2018 by rtushnet

The Administrative-Private Law Interface in IP,  March 29, 2018 A conference co-organized by the Project on the Foundations of Private Law at Harvard Law School and the University of Texas School of Law, sponsored by Qualcomm Inc. More info here. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Breakout Session IV

Posted on August 11, 2017 by rtushnet

Copyright Enforcement  Protecting Copyright Integrity – Shyamkrishna Balganesh & Gideon Parchomovsky Dominant theory: © is about value. Additional assumption: w/every exclusive right comes important limitations. Every grant of power is also clear placing of limits on scope of that power. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

2017 IPSC Conference at Cardozo School of Law

Posted on August 10, 2017 by rtushnet

Usual disclaimers; there were lots of overlaps where I had to make tough choices, and I favored presentations where I hadn’t previously commented on drafts. Day 1 Breakout Session I Trademark Doctrine Mapping Confusion – Mark. P. McKenna & Rebecca … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

2017 IPSC Conference at Cardozo School of Law

Posted on August 10, 2017 by rtushnet

Usual disclaimers; there were lots of overlaps where I had to make tough choices, and I favored presentations where I hadn’t previously commented on drafts. Day 1 Breakout Session I Trademark Doctrine Mapping Confusion – Mark. P. McKenna & Rebecca … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP, part 4

Posted on February 11, 2017 by rtushnet

Mark McKenna & Jessica Silbey, Investigating Design: An Empirical Study of Industrial Design and IP Protection Interviews & institutional analysis. Hypothesis generating—anti-copying/copying practices, etc. Buccafusco: consider who’s in the sample—don’t limit to self-identified designers. Following career trajectories of design school … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP, part 2

Posted on February 10, 2017 by rtushnet

H. Brian Holland, We Are All Cyborgs Now: A Cognitive Theory of the Third-Party Doctrine Once upon a time there were categorical protectsion for private papers against search & seizure. Courts then ruled that personal property was no longer categorically … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC breakout session 2

Posted on August 11, 2016 by rtushnet

IPSC Breakout Session II: Trademarks, Advertising & Consumers Relying on Reputation Jim Gibson Reputation: what rational consumers would use to decide what products/services to buy. We shouldn’t expect that info to be widely available to consumers w/o some help, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Commercial speech: strategic issues

Posted on June 13, 2016 by rtushnet

Strategic Issues:  What questions are we asking now? Where is the law going?   Moderator:  Timothy L. Alger, Greenberg Traurig LLP: In today’s economy, what isn’t an ad?  Is the death of the commercial/noncommercial distinction inevitable?   A: depends on … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Brand journalism: sponsored content/the 1A

Posted on June 13, 2016 by rtushnet

Brand Journalism, Sponsored Content and the First Amendment   Moderator:   Scott Dailard, Cooley LLP   Mary K. Engle, Federal Trade Commission, Associate Director, Division of Advertising Practices: We’re going to proceed as if there is a commercial/noncommercial divide.  To hold … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The definition of commercial speech

Posted on June 13, 2016 by rtushnet

Commercial Speech:  The Definition Matters Moderators:  Chris Beall, Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz LLP and Bruce Johnson, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP   Steven G. Brody, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP: We barely spoke about the definition of commercial speech. Why?  … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment