Tag Archives: consumer protection

Visual comparison in online contract formation

Posted on August 11, 2025 by rtushnet

Cody v. Jill Acquisition LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 1822907, No. 25-CV-937 TWR (KSC) (S.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2025) I wouldn’t usually blog a consumer class action that was just about arbitration, but I want to highlight this one … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

9th Circuit affirms class status based on materiality of claim in product name

Posted on July 28, 2025 by rtushnet

Noohi v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., — F.4th —-, 2025 WL 2089582, No. 23-55190 (9th Cir. Jul. 25, 2025) J&J sells Neutrogena Oil-Free Face Moisturizer for Sensitive Skin. The district court certified a class in a consumer protection case … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

amicus in Prevagen v. FTC appeal

Posted on July 25, 2025 by rtushnet

 Led by Truth in Advertising; I was happy to sign on. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2025/07/amicus-in-prevagen-v-ftc-appeal.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

AI voice cloning opinion narrows claims to ROP, rejecting TM and (most) copyright theories

Posted on July 21, 2025 by rtushnet

Lehrman v. Lovo, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 1902547, 24-CV-3770 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 10, 2025) Plaintiffs alleged that Lovo misled them about its use of their voices, using AI to synthesize and sell unauthorized “clones” of their voices. They … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

even if it’s not a security, a stablecoin can trigger false advertising claims

Posted on July 17, 2025 by rtushnet

Donovan v. GMO-Z.com Trust Company, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 522503, No. 23 Civ. 8431 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, 2025) Plaintiffs sued GMO Trust, alleging that it violated federal securities laws and NY state consumer protection laws in connection … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

California’s Made in the USA safe harbors aren’t preempted by federal law

Posted on July 17, 2025 by rtushnet

McCoy v. McCormick & Co., 2025 WL 1918546, No. 1:25-cv-00231-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2025) (R&R) McCoy alleged that French’s mustard bottles were falsely advertised with the claim “Crafted and Bottled in Springfield, MO, USA,” appearing at times with “American … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

P&G’s brand extension ZzzQuil must face lawsuit alleging falsity of its “Non-Habit Forming” claim

Posted on July 14, 2025 by rtushnet

Sneed v. Procter & Gamble Company, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 1017933, No. 23-cv-05443-JST (N.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2025) This case is about a product I recently noticed, “Nighttime Sleep Aid” products containing diphenhydramine hydrochloride as ZzzQuil. Sneed alleged that … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

ambiguity in consumer class actions v. the Lanham Act: convergence or divergence?

Posted on July 7, 2025 by rtushnet

Slaten v. Christian Dior Perfumes, LLC, 2025 WL 1840026, No. 23-cv-00409-JSC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2025) The concept of ambiguity is now on a path to become as entrenched in consumer protection cases as in Lanham Act cases. My thinking … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Southern discomfort: class certified over malt beverage dressed like Southern Comfort whiskey

Posted on July 4, 2025 by rtushnet

Andrews v. Sazerac Co., 2025 WL 1808797, No. 23-cv-1060 (AS) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 1, 2025) Plaintiffs alleged that Sazerac deceived consumers by selling a malt beverage that looks like Southern Comfort whiskey but in fact contains only “whiskey flavor.” The court … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

claim of failure to warn of kratom’s addiction potential not preempted; a “disease claim” involves helping, not causing, disease

Posted on July 3, 2025 by rtushnet

J.J. v. Ashlynn Marketing Gp., 2025 WL 1811854, No. 24-cv-00311-GPC-MSB (S.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2025) Plaintiffs sued on behalf of putative nationwide, California, and NY classes, alleging that Ashlynn failed to warn consumers of the potentially addictive nature of its … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment