Tag Archives: copyright

WIPIP Concurrent 2

Nancy Kim, The License v. Sale Puzzle after Impressions v. Lexmark Sales exhaust the patentee’s rights to any item regardless of what the contract says. But restrictions on licensees are different because a license doesn’t implicate the same concerns about … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP panel one: TM tarnishment and (c)

[title fixed because I can’t keep seasons straight] Suneal Bedi, Bad Brands: Experimental Studies in Trademark Tarnishment What is the reputation of a mark?  Working on PhD in marketing at Penn; marketing is the best discipline to answer this Q.  … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP: Opening plenary

WIPIP Plenary [Standard disclaimer: these are just my notes; I miss stuff or it’s about patents and I don’t necessarily get it; I also have to pick and choose from many attractive panels and this year I’m only at the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

DMCA exemption survey: for vidders and other remixers

Take an 8-minute survey and help make the #DMCA decryption exemptions more user-friendly for vidders: bit.ly/2nEfY8j from Blogger http://ift.tt/2nSexmN

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

false advertising of copyright ownership of songs not preempted, court rules

Carter v. Pallante, 256 F. Supp. 3d 791 (N.D. Ill. 2017) Tollie Carter sued, as relevant here, alleging that ARC, Fuji, and BMG infringed his copyrights in certain songs by selling unauthorized licenses to third parties, who in turn publicly … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Website copying allegations allow potpourri of claims

DHI Group, Inc. v. Kent, No. 16-1670, 2017 WL 4837730 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2017) DHI and Oilpro compete in the market for websites for oil and gas professionals that include job postings. DHI filed a lawsuit against Oilpro and … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Fantasy gambling is newsworthy, doesn’t violate players’ rights of publicity

Daniels v. FanDuel, Inc., No. 16-cv-01230 (S.D. Ind. Sept. 29, 2017) Akeem Daniels, Cameron Stingily, and Nicholas Stoner played college football and sued FanDuel and DraftKings for violating their Indiana right of publicity. Defendants run fantasy sports websites and mobile … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Harvard JOLT seeks submissions

The Harvard Journal of Law and Technology is one of the leading journals covering the ever-developing interaction between law and technology. JOLT Digest is the Journal’s online-only companion, providing timely updates and new perspectives on recent developments in technology law, … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Breakout Session V

Copyright Theory (my apologies; I had to leave early for a flight) Redundancy and AntiRedundancy In Copyright – Oren Bracha & John M. Golden Doctrines that overlap: fair use/functionality; fair use/improper appropriation; copyrightable subject matter originality; reproduction/derivative works rights (cautionary … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

IPSC Breakout Session IV

Copyright Enforcement  Protecting Copyright Integrity – Shyamkrishna Balganesh & Gideon Parchomovsky Dominant theory: © is about value. Additional assumption: w/every exclusive right comes important limitations. Every grant of power is also clear placing of limits on scope of that power. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment